Lots of optimists in this poll. It would be great if YB can get out of this mess. The key IMO would be to secure enough credible capital aka WB/GS in 2008. Both “enough” & “credible” being important /1
2/ If capital is required for provisions then the bank is already trading at a post-money valuation which means the real economic mcap is already lower by the amount required for provisions
3/ Plus additional growth capital for growth. At these or lower prices that dilution is huge! Dilutions esp below book value destroy shareholder value
4/ Why “credible”? Because that will give confidence to the market and stop the shorts. Hedge fund money is hot money and not sure MFs will have the cohones to cough up “enough” after the QIP debacle
5/ If they don’t get enough capital will be a field day for shorts. Lower price. Bigger raise needed. More dilution. Already the low delivery vols suggest that there is massive day trading.
6/ If God forbid there is no buyer and price declines continue the RBI may seek to protect a/c holders and contain the collateral damage by forcing a merger. So the big question is who will bite the bullet and at what price?
7/ If you are long (there seem to be a fair bit of them), I reckon your thesis should rest on the likelihood of no more negative surprises and that the $300 M QIP is sufficient for growth. How this plays out time will tell. Let’s see what happens. Disc: No positions / end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I want to discuss an often overlooked qualitative aspect in thesis building - which to my mind becomes significantly important if it involves crossing stages (ie small to mid cap, mid to large cap) or rapid growth situations 🧵…
2/ That aspect is CULTURE. This is not about fuzzy words on vision or values. What it means in the investing context is the first line of this tweet. (Will use CEO/promoter/mgmt interchangeably for the rest of this thread)
3/ Given the benefit of observing companies from my vantage point across stages I have come to believe that there are spurts of growth followed by consolidation (just like a technical price chart). The process is reflexive and iterative.
1/ <THREAD> Buying in a sell-off. My past mistakes in contra calls come down to 3 things (a) Believing the worst is over (b) buying too soon too quickly (c) Trying to max return while not minimizing risk. This is intended mostly for non-(professional/experienced) investors
2/ Sell-offs are complex because there are multiple things at play. There are (a) negative fundamentals, (b) short-sellers. In addition, multiple sharp negative moves indicate (c) unwinding of leverage. These sharp moves bring in the panic sellers. Will touch on all three
3/ Negative fundamentals are the easiest to navigate – it has leading indicators, is usually well disseminated and understood and therefore some degree of it begins to be priced in before the sell-off itself.
1/ The initial thesis was based on a strong player emerging from a crisis. Both operators and tower cos had consolidated. Infratel had and still has the balance sheet to withstand a few challenging years
2/ Networks are choked and still are. Another part of the bet was that tariffs would rise over time giving telcos the much needed cash to deploy networks, notwithstanding their overleveraged balance sheets
0/ A compilation of all (well most) #threads I have posted on #FinTwit in no particular order. I will keep adding new threads I post on this main thread and pin it to my profile. No reccos implied or otherwise. Share & discuss if you find it useful ...
1/ On investing mistakes, diligence findings and lessons ... this will be updated from time to time ...
1/ Thread on some interesting data and views from KKR’s global macro piece “Stick to the plan” available at kkr.com/global-perspec… Not comprehensive, just data points I liked shared.
2/ Globalisation is reversing, global trade is falling and being mixed with national security the world over. We are in unchartered territory. KKR expects a recession (I know it’s a topic beaten to death) in 2020
3/ While we have been in a long bull market driven by the tech sector, growth ex-tech has been tough, virtually non-existent. US has maxed out its earnings driven by tax cuts, QE & buybacks
1/ So interestingly, a third of respondents don’t like real estate as a space. Though from a business model perspective I agree with the conclusion that bldg materials (BM) is the best way to play this because —>
2/ BM has renovation demand and ‘trading-up’ demand which takes away some of the cyclicality, has the ability to build distribution which if done right adds to the “moat” and lends itself to the optionality of being asset light
3/ In contrast, Devs and financiers are by and large capital hungry. When you are capital hungry you open yourself to two risks. That of regularly raising capital and the price at which you get it. If caught in a bad cycle you could wipe out years of return