I mean, I also brought up these points, but it does matter and yeah, he did expect he could bring the map out and no one would say anything.

Or rather, he knew the world would divide up neatly into two groups: those who swallowed it without blinking, and those who balked.
When pressed to the point in focus groups, many of Trump's most stalwart supporters admit they know he lies and don't care.

Those who don't, by sheer dint of believing contradictory things he spits out, are literally believing whatever he says.
Donald Trump does not want his power to rest on conditional approval of anyone. It's why he went after Comey so viciously, why he goes after media outlets that have been good for him like CNN: power he does not *own* is a weapon that can be used against him.
Donald Trump is constantly testing the people around him, requiring them to agree with things that are obviously false because he said them, challenging them to contradict or correct him.
He doesn't want followers who are with him because he tends to be right about things... he wants followers who believe he's right because they're with him.

In Trumpland, a thing is true because he says it.
When he makes the lie insulting and obvious as a scribbled marker line on a weather map, he's priming his followers for another test. The aides who went along with that and let it happen passed the test. The allies who will say nothing or, if asked, defend him are passing, too.
And on a psychological level, it's not just that Trump is reassured that his people are on his side... in reassuring him, they become more on his side. They become that much more invested in him, in their own obedience, in his rightness.
And everybody who questions, who points it out? To his followers, we are "triggered by a line on a map". We have so much "Trump Derangement Syndrome" that we take issue with a weather map.

Master has owned the libs.
"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. " 1984, George Orwell.

Trump recognizes this should be your *first* command. You don't work your way up to it. It's your opening gambit.
Donald Trump, on the very first day of his so-called presidency, for the very first test of his press secretary, sent Sean Spicer out to argue that a very small crowd we could all see was much bigger.
On day one, he talked about how God stopped the rain from falling on him, when we could all see that this hadn't happened.
These things were not *just* about protecting his own ego. They were about those things, but nothing Trump does is just, in any sense of the word.
People on Trump's side who weren't all in for him... went along with this obvious, insulting lies, because what did it matter to humor him? Why burn political capital and goodwill they might need later for more consequential fights? They believed they could *manage* him.
But each time they made an excuse to not contradict him, each time they nodded along or found a way to reframe the harmless nonsense he demanded they support... they made it harder to fight him, harder to manage him. They built a relationship with him where that didn't work.
Every day, Trump sharpens his razor and draws it across the skin of this country, dividing us into the people who will go along and the people who won't.

And it matters.
It matters if Trump presents a doodle like it's a satellite map, just like it matters when he stages a show with prop binders or stacks of paper, just like it matters when he insists he has a secret plan...
It all matters. The truth matters. Reality matters.
Also, what kind of galaxy brain take is it to suggest that no one thought the scribbled circle would fool anyone? I mean. Isn't it amazing that we have a supreme executive who would do that and we're just supposed to shrug?
It's only worth commenting on if it had a chance of tricking us? It's not remarkable that it happened in the first place?
Honestly... I'm having a hard time imagining how, in any other administration, people wouldn't have *quit* over this. They can't literally stop him from doing it but who would want to be associated with it?
"Over a line scribbled on a map, isn't that a bit extreme?"

A president, on national TV, showing a hand-drawn amendment to a week-old weather map in order to back up an errant tweet? Yes. It's the perfect mixture of dishonest and humiliating.
Your boss, the most important and powerful person in the world, wants you to stand next to him in a video for literally all the world to see, while he shows a map on which he drew a circle to try to retroactively make a now moot point true.

And you go along with it?
I know why they went along with it. See the entire rest of this thread. I'm just trying to highlight how absolutely incredible this is, how remarkable it is... it is remarkable, so we're remarking upon it. That's what remarkable means.
Final thought here - in the story of the Emperor's New Clothes, no one was fooled into thinking they saw the clothes. They might or might not individually have believed the clothes existed, but they all knew they were themselves looking at the emperor's naked body.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Erin (she/her)

Alexandra Erin (she/her) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexandraErin

Feb 21
Along the lines of the sentiment in this tweet: one thing about the Critical Role cartoon is it illustrates how much more interesting magic tends to be in the stories that inspired or were inspired by D&D than in actual D&D.
Like, a lot of the magic use in Legend of Vox Machina has a direct line of inspiration from spells that exist in the D&D rules, and a general trope of being able to exhaust one's magic if overused correlates in a vague way with the game's expendable spell slots.
But the magic does not behave like D&D magic, even D&D magic with an inventive player and generously flexible DM. Because D&D's magic obeys rules designed with specific gameplay purposes in mind, and LoVM's magic obeys rules designed with storytelling purposes in mind.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 20
Counterpoint: You will never have a "full understanding" of anything, much less something as broad, amorphous, and multifaceted as a genre.

Prioritizing what aspects of what parts of the genre you will seek to understand is also your finite coin to spend however you like.
Also, classics are classics for several reasons, only one of which is, sometimes, "This is pretty good."

A far more prevalent reason that classics are classics is generations of dingdongs going, "You gotta to read this. You just gotta."

And several of the reasons are racism.
Read 14 tweets
Feb 20
A thing about "D&D is mainly good for combat, you can tell because of what it has rules for" is that if you released an indie game that had all the non-combat parts of D&D it would be more rules-heavy than a lot of non-combat indie games are.
Anyway, D&D rules aren't 90% combat. They're 90% character options. The PHB is about 300 pages and about 30 of those pages deal with rules for gameplay. The rest are "Here is a thing your character might do/be."
And by and large, the reason I'm into D&D and the reason I like to get new people into D&D is that I vibe with "Here are a bunch of modular, prefab character options you can snap together like interlocking plastic building blocks" more than more abstract character creation stuff.
Read 31 tweets
Feb 18
Literally eating berries and cream like a little lad for breakfast today.
We're paring down frozen stuff from the freezer for a much-needed defrost and there were some ancient frozen mixed berries in there.

I started making panna cotta as my new pandemic skill and I had planned on topping some with jam for a Valentine's dessert...
...but panna cotta isn't terribly firm and the likely difficulty of spreading jam across the top of the custard without just wrecking it had me thinking about other alternatives, and I remembered we had frozen berries from Whenever in the deep freeze.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 13
The Ted Talk in the second episode of Inventing Anna is such a perfect parody of a Ted Talk because it sounds exactly like a real Ted Talk. In this tweet, I will
My version of "don't watch dinosaur movies with paleontologists" is "don't watch movies with scenes taking place in Omaha malls or cultural attractions".

I don't know where those zoo exteriors were shot for the Berkshire Hathaway party scene, but I know where it wasn't shot.
As a general rule, I think big-city people who watch a movie and go, "Shyeah, they expect us to believe she took the chartreuse line at KT-tirst street and somehow got off across town at the Spromg Street station in time to catch the zeppelin? As if." are insufferable.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
A thing about NFTs is that whenever someone says they can be used to purchase something (event tickets, digital music, in-game assets) in a form that allows the purchaser to re-sell them... the reason you can't do those things already is a policy choice, not a technical limit.
Any company that is willing to use NFTs to sell you things that you own in a way that is transferable could have done so without NFTs.

What NFTs actually add on a technical level isn't the ability to be sold, but the ability to be stolen.
Whatever digital good the NFT represents is still stored in a central location. Access to the digital good is still mediated by a single central authority. But their willingness to equate ownership with a cryptographic token that exists outside their control makes it stealable.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(