Literally eating berries and cream like a little lad for breakfast today.
We're paring down frozen stuff from the freezer for a much-needed defrost and there were some ancient frozen mixed berries in there.
I started making panna cotta as my new pandemic skill and I had planned on topping some with jam for a Valentine's dessert...
...but panna cotta isn't terribly firm and the likely difficulty of spreading jam across the top of the custard without just wrecking it had me thinking about other alternatives, and I remembered we had frozen berries from Whenever in the deep freeze.
But it was a great big bag of berries, all frozen together into one solid block so just thawing out what I needed would have been tricky, and also we're trying to winnow down the freezer for a safe defrost, so I've got a whole bunch of slightly freezer-burned berry topping left.
This is a new freezer, replaced a dead/dying one that came with the house just a couple of years ago. Would have liked to get one that self-defrosts but the setup of our old house is we had to prioritize for the largest freezer small enough to fit where we needed to put it.
Anyway, it turns out that panna cotta is a really easy dessert to make, particularly if you're not doing the thing at the end where you invert and plate it. And that part might not be that hard but I'm not actually interested in finding out.
My first exposure to panna cotta and the reason I'm nostalgic for it was it being served as a hotel cocktail hour dessert in little ramekins so I have no interest in seeing it naked and wibbling gelatinously on a little plate.
Also, one member of our three-person household who was not in on the planning mistook all discussions of "panna cotta" that happened in front of her for references to the pandemic until I started serving the test batch.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Ted Talk in the second episode of Inventing Anna is such a perfect parody of a Ted Talk because it sounds exactly like a real Ted Talk. In this tweet, I will
My version of "don't watch dinosaur movies with paleontologists" is "don't watch movies with scenes taking place in Omaha malls or cultural attractions".
I don't know where those zoo exteriors were shot for the Berkshire Hathaway party scene, but I know where it wasn't shot.
As a general rule, I think big-city people who watch a movie and go, "Shyeah, they expect us to believe she took the chartreuse line at KT-tirst street and somehow got off across town at the Spromg Street station in time to catch the zeppelin? As if." are insufferable.
A thing about NFTs is that whenever someone says they can be used to purchase something (event tickets, digital music, in-game assets) in a form that allows the purchaser to re-sell them... the reason you can't do those things already is a policy choice, not a technical limit.
Any company that is willing to use NFTs to sell you things that you own in a way that is transferable could have done so without NFTs.
What NFTs actually add on a technical level isn't the ability to be sold, but the ability to be stolen.
Whatever digital good the NFT represents is still stored in a central location. Access to the digital good is still mediated by a single central authority. But their willingness to equate ownership with a cryptographic token that exists outside their control makes it stealable.
If you want special treatment from people who do customer service type work, the real trick is to be polite in a way that doesn't take up their time or energy.
Not asking for much and being a good customer > telling people you're not asking for much and insisting that you're a good customer.
If you do ask for something and they don't/can't do it, the best move is to make it clear that the query is over so that they aren't on the defensive for the rest of the interaction. "Cool, just checking." or whatever fits tonally, then move to the next thing.
Every day I am grateful that the Wall Street Journal paywall prevents me from reading things that I don't actually want to read, that were commissioned or greenlit specifically to irritate people into reading.
Sometimes the grapes that are out of reach really are sour. Sometimes they were soured by design.
Also, the expression "sour grapes", as I have alluded to, comes from a fable attributed to Aesop, about a hungry fox who cannot reach some grapes, so he declares they are unripe and that he wouldn't "eat sour grapes" anyway.
I don't know who needs to hear this but if someone doesn't want to watch a movie with a ton of over-the-top ordinance-based violence in it, "But it's satirical!" would only be relevant if their objection was about what is moral to put in a movie and not what is palatable to them.
And I would swear that there's already been enough "Movies that show one good hero cop fighting against the corrupt copacracy is still copaganda." discourse.
Like, Robocop had a lot of things to say about bad cops, but it didn't actually posit the cops themselves as the problem?
My recollection is that he ended the movie by defeating the main evil corporate guy who was responsible for bad stuff then went back to being a cop with superpowers for a sequel or two and maybe a couple of TV spin-offs. Is that not copaganda?
(NB: Replies are open for replies to my answer, not to the question below. I have not asked how you feel about firearms in DND5E. On Twitter, your reply is supposed to be attached to the thing you are actually replying to.)
And these days as a game runner, I am for the most part of the mindset that the world can include somewhere any reasonable, approximately game-legal and approximately balanced thing a player wants for their character, because it's their fantasy, too.
Depending on my relationships with the players, I may take a firm stance on third party and homebrew options; specifically, if I have very differing levels of familiarity with them. "If it's in a WOTC 5E book, you can use it." is objective and treats everybody the same.