1. For example, the IPCC report that led to the Kyoto Protocol was altered AFTER peer review to remove the comments about doubts w/which scientists had re global warming claims
wsj.com/articles/SB834…
reuters.com/article/us-glo…
Scientific consensus is a lie.
Here’s a 2008 US Senate report of over 700 independent DISSENTING scientists. Compare this number to the 52 “coin-operated” scientists who supported the UN’s 2007 IPCC report.
epw.senate.gov/public/index.c…
telegraph.co.uk/comment/column…
forbes.com/sites/jamestay…
telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/env…