What is QT? (Yes yes, it can be your texting shorthand to get your groove on)
QT refers to the interval on the electrocardiocgram, in milliseconds, between the START of the QRS complex to the END of the T Wave
(as the graph shows, if you wanna be super fancy, we calculate the end of the T wave by intersecting the maximum slope with the isoelectric baseline)
Why is QT important?
It is the electrical approximation of the time it takes for the ventricles to contract and relax
If the QT is too long (or short, think hypercalcemia and be careful, but we'll address this later), there is a risk for ventricular dysthymia and sudden death.
Long QT can lead to Torsades de Pointes (literally "twisting of the peaks"), which looks like a ventricular tachycardia rotating (like a helix).
TdP spontaneously and quickly reverts to normal rhythm, but it is likely to return & can lead to ventricular fibrillation and death.
So then what is QTc?
Well because rate will affect all intervals, it is necessary to adjust for rate to detect clinically important QT. With a fast rate, a shorter QT might be important, so you don't want to miss it. Conversely, you can tolerate longer QTs with a slow rate.
QTc is calculated by three main formulas. There is debate over which is best... but most of the cardiologists I respect tell me the Frederica formula is probably the closest.
1) calculate: RR interval in seconds 2) cube root that 3) use that number as the divisor of the QT
Example:
HR is 80bpm (RR = 60/HR = 0.75)
QT is 425msec
The cube root of RR is .9086
QTc=425msec/.9086=468 msec
So you have your QTc, now what?
1) please do your best to understand how your QTc will be calculated. Many machines that calculate it automatically will give you the Bazetts Formula (square root not cube root), which overcalls prolonged QTc at faster rates.
2) have your yellow/red zone set:
♀️:
caution: 450-460 msec
uh-oh: 460+
♂️:
caution: 430-450 msec
uh-oh: 450+
3) know your medications effect on QT!
The most FAMOUS psychiatric meds that prolong QT are antidepressants, but MOST DO NOT (except citalopram, escitalopram, and TCAs like amitriptyline)
The meds you need to be really careful about? ANTIPSYCHOTICS AND METHADONE. (No, not ADHD meds)
Lurasidone is so far the only "OK" antipsychotic for QT prolongation.
Methadone can increase QTc by more than 20s.
So ECG for all potential QT starts (*citalopram, TCAs, APs)?
I'm on team "yes." It's far higher value than the stupid MRIs and TSHs we order (brainlessly w/no benefit) and if a problem occurs, having a baseline ECG will be of huge value.
I'd also monitor regularly anyone who:
So please , learners, physicians, and psychiatrists, consider QTc knowledge as an important part of your medical practice, especially when you prescribe medications.
Also, when in doubt, work with your pharmacy colleagues to check interactions/additive effects.
/End thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Point 1: "Disease-targeting" is an invented criterion
1a. You demand drugs show "disease-targeting effects" or be presumed harmful. This is never necessary. The actual claim: reliable symptom change across replicated RCTs.
/2
Point 1: "Disease-targeting" is an invented criterion
1b. Cardiology doesn't know the molecular lesion driving most post-MI mortality benefit from beta-blockers. We use them anyway because they work. "No known mechanism, therefore presume harm" would gut most of medicine.
/3
The core trick: he treats prescription prevalence as self-evidently bad. But high rates only signal a problem if the meds don't work, are given to people who don't need them, or cause net harm. He establishes none of this. He just gestures at numbers.
/2
The same rhetorical structure would indict insulin prescribing, or asthma inhalers. Prevalence is not pathology. The question is whether treatment matches need — and whether the alternative (untreated illness) is better or worse.
/3
It makes no sense the way we treat our people with disabilities in Canada. Canada has the full apparatus to implement adjusted payments, yet we typically support disabled people WELL under the poverty line.
/1
Canada has an official poverty line: the Market Basket Measure. It's regionally calibrated, methodologically sound, and updated by StatCan.
A single person on BC PWD receives ~$18.4k/year. The Vancouver MBM is ~$29k.
That's not a rounding error. It's a structural choice.
PWD recipients in Vancouver sit at roughly 47% of the poverty line and below the Deep Income Poverty threshold (75% of MBM), which is the level StatCan uses to flag the worst material deprivation in the country.
/3
To be clear, my first answer is "well we know they are supposed to block serotonin reuptake, but it's not that simple and we don't really know."
But, if you want the best 2026 science...
/1
For a few particularly science-interested patients, I walk them through what we currently have for the 'best evidence' even though we're still not sure.
This is the "best story" I can tell about SSRI's right now.
(nb, this is NOT locked in, this is MY best synthesis)
/2
1) SSRIs BLOCK the Serotonin Transporter
The protein that pulls serotonin back into the neuron after its released is blocked. Serotonin lingers longer in the synapse, the gap where neurons signal each other.
This is very well established, & how SSRIs were designed.
The Ihben story is making the rounds. "Judge forced 18 vaccines, child got autism." It's being treated as a smoking gun. It is not a smoking gun. It is barely a story.
Sourcing: one father, one advocacy org (CHD), one GiveSendGo. Records sealed. No filings. No named physicians. Every outlet repeating it cites the same Defender article. This is a closed loop, not corroboration.
/2
"18 vaccines in one day" is not a thing. That number counts antigens as doses to make the headline scream. Real catch-up schedules don't work this way and you can verify that in five minutes on the CDC site.
/3
Ask any person who has been even suggested to have BPD; they will uniformly tell you that they have been told to try DBT (Dialectical Behavioural Therapy). Reflexively recommended. "Gold standard."
This is not science-supported.
/1
Quick history: Marsha Linehan developed DBT in the late 1980s, published the foundational manual in 1993. She drew on CBT, Zen Buddhism, and dialectical philosophy. Brilliant clinician, brilliant marketer. Her institute has trained tens of thousands of therapists worldwide.
/2
That marketing machine is the reason DBT is "the BPD treatment." It is not the reason DBT works better than alternatives, because it does not.
The faint superiority signals in older trials evaporate once you adjust for allegiance bias (DBT researchers studying DBT).
/3