What is QT? (Yes yes, it can be your texting shorthand to get your groove on)
QT refers to the interval on the electrocardiocgram, in milliseconds, between the START of the QRS complex to the END of the T Wave
(as the graph shows, if you wanna be super fancy, we calculate the end of the T wave by intersecting the maximum slope with the isoelectric baseline)
Why is QT important?
It is the electrical approximation of the time it takes for the ventricles to contract and relax
If the QT is too long (or short, think hypercalcemia and be careful, but we'll address this later), there is a risk for ventricular dysthymia and sudden death.
Long QT can lead to Torsades de Pointes (literally "twisting of the peaks"), which looks like a ventricular tachycardia rotating (like a helix).
TdP spontaneously and quickly reverts to normal rhythm, but it is likely to return & can lead to ventricular fibrillation and death.
So then what is QTc?
Well because rate will affect all intervals, it is necessary to adjust for rate to detect clinically important QT. With a fast rate, a shorter QT might be important, so you don't want to miss it. Conversely, you can tolerate longer QTs with a slow rate.
QTc is calculated by three main formulas. There is debate over which is best... but most of the cardiologists I respect tell me the Frederica formula is probably the closest.
1) calculate: RR interval in seconds 2) cube root that 3) use that number as the divisor of the QT
Example:
HR is 80bpm (RR = 60/HR = 0.75)
QT is 425msec
The cube root of RR is .9086
QTc=425msec/.9086=468 msec
So you have your QTc, now what?
1) please do your best to understand how your QTc will be calculated. Many machines that calculate it automatically will give you the Bazetts Formula (square root not cube root), which overcalls prolonged QTc at faster rates.
2) have your yellow/red zone set:
♀️:
caution: 450-460 msec
uh-oh: 460+
♂️:
caution: 430-450 msec
uh-oh: 450+
3) know your medications effect on QT!
The most FAMOUS psychiatric meds that prolong QT are antidepressants, but MOST DO NOT (except citalopram, escitalopram, and TCAs like amitriptyline)
The meds you need to be really careful about? ANTIPSYCHOTICS AND METHADONE. (No, not ADHD meds)
Lurasidone is so far the only "OK" antipsychotic for QT prolongation.
Methadone can increase QTc by more than 20s.
So ECG for all potential QT starts (*citalopram, TCAs, APs)?
I'm on team "yes." It's far higher value than the stupid MRIs and TSHs we order (brainlessly w/no benefit) and if a problem occurs, having a baseline ECG will be of huge value.
I'd also monitor regularly anyone who:
So please , learners, physicians, and psychiatrists, consider QTc knowledge as an important part of your medical practice, especially when you prescribe medications.
Also, when in doubt, work with your pharmacy colleagues to check interactions/additive effects.
/End thread
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To be clear, my first answer is "well we know they are supposed to block serotonin reuptake, but it's not that simple and we don't really know."
But, if you want the best 2026 science...
/1
For a few particularly science-interested patients, I walk them through what we currently have for the 'best evidence' even though we're still not sure.
This is the "best story" I can tell about SSRI's right now.
(nb, this is NOT locked in, this is MY best synthesis)
/2
1) SSRIs BLOCK the Serotonin Transporter
The protein that pulls serotonin back into the neuron after its released is blocked. Serotonin lingers longer in the synapse, the gap where neurons signal each other.
This is very well established, & how SSRIs were designed.
Ask any person who has been even suggested to have BPD; they will uniformly tell you that they have been told to try DBT (Dialectical Behavioural Therapy). Reflexively recommended. "Gold standard."
This is not science-supported.
/1
Quick history: Marsha Linehan developed DBT in the late 1980s, published the foundational manual in 1993. She drew on CBT, Zen Buddhism, and dialectical philosophy. Brilliant clinician, brilliant marketer. Her institute has trained tens of thousands of therapists worldwide.
/2
That marketing machine is the reason DBT is "the BPD treatment." It is not the reason DBT works better than alternatives, because it does not.
The faint superiority signals in older trials evaporate once you adjust for allegiance bias (DBT researchers studying DBT).
/3
The McCullough Foundation's @NicHulscher — who posts garbage medical misinformation — styles himself an "independent epidemiologist."
His entire career has been spent publishing with, and working for, McCullough.
No academic post, no health agency, no clinical role, no pre-Foundation experience. Hired straight out of his 2024 MPH by the senior author on nearly every paper bearing his name.
/2
He publishes almost exclusively with McCullough, overwhelmingly in predatory or fringe journals, and has already been retracted twice — plus an Expression of Concern — in a career that's barely two years old.
/3
Since MAID has been enacted in 2014, approximately 90,000 Canadians have chosen dying by this method rather than painful, drawn out, or medically complicated deaths.
This represents 0.2% of the Canadian population and accounts for approximately 2% of all deaths since 2014.
The amount of time that American & Canadian right wingers spent on MAID is ridiculous. It is certainly a controversial policy, but it boogeymanning about it is bonkers.
It's not the #1 cause of death. Cancer, for example, kills 90k per year, or as many as MAID in 14 years.
/2
The reality of MAID:
1) The Median age of MAID is 79 years old. (the same age as the median age of COVID which right wingers have decided was 'fine' because they were old anyway)
2) 95.6% are track 1 (death imminent)
3) People who receive MAID do not disproportionately come from lower-income or disadvantaged communities.
4) People who receive MAID are less likely (not more likely) to live in remote areas.
5) 75% have received palliative (end of life) care and also choose MAID
6) A very small proportion (0.1%) required, but did not receive, disability support services; of these individuals, 91.4% confirmed that services were accessible to them.
7) Minorities are under-represented (not over-represented) in those receiving MAID.
/3
If we analyze a group of 40-year-old adults with the same diagnostic criteria & screening as we use currently on children, we get virtually identical rates of autism.
"Exploding rates of autism" likely a reflection of our exploding understanding.
A 2025 Canadian study estimated 1.8% autism prevalence in adults, similar to child rates, showing diagnosis consistency across ages despite evolving awareness.
/2
From 2011-2022 US data found increased autism diagnoses in children, alongside rises in young adult diagnoses simultaneously, not lagged. This implies that it is not something new to this generation.
/3