It's surprisingly easy to picture how UK journalists would behave under a military dictatorship.
A thread about the regime of Britain's ruler, General Killmore, being fearlessly held to account by the British press.
Kuenssberg: after months of speculation, the leader of the Opposition was today found buried in an unmarked grave.
Opposition MPs blamed agents of General Killmore. But when I asked him, he seemed reluctant to agree.
Marr: General Killmore - several of your critics, in exile, have suggested that the recent wave of indefinite detentions,
which you had ordered, may have worrying implications for democracy.
How do you respond to that?
Fiona Bruce: Here's our first audience question, and tonight it's about civility in politics #bbcqt:
"Are critics of the government too aggressive when it comes to discussing so-called 'disappearances', and 'beatings'?"
Here's our second question for the audience tonight #bbcqt:
"We've all lost small items, and been unable to find them when needed.
Does it matter that state prosecutors lost the evidence they required, just before General Killmore's trial for corruption charges?"
Independent: Government set to announce new laws, and new punishments for breaking them.
Times: Government outlines bold agenda for reform.
The Spectator would come into its own.
Rod Liddle: People who moan about General Killmore for merely imposing commonsense, and martial law, are the REAL enemies of freedom.
Brendan O'Neill: It's not government "censorship", but the Opposition's linguistic fascism, which REALLY imperils free speech.
Nick Cohen: It isn't military dictatorships which should worry us. The radical student Left are the REAL fascists.
Burchill: Fascism? If the alternative is Brommunism, I know which I'd prefer.
A human rights lawyer tries to impeach the government.
Her youngest brother had been involved in student protests; then mysteriously vanished one night, never to be seen again.
GuidoFawkes:
EXCLUSIVE - former waitress behind lawsuit against the government once had an affair with a married man.
Guardian comment: Suspending parliament, imposing curfews, exiling opponents - has General Killmore gone too far?
Our panel responds.
Elsewhere on the Guardian's website:
John Harris: Middle-class liberals complain about the use of torture - but on the backstreets of Sussex, I found people who long for law and order.
Jonathan Freedland: We still don't really know how to deal with fascism.
On the one hand, we can do something about it. On the other, we can do nothing.
It's impossible to say which is the better option.
A general strike is called against the government.
Industrial workers rally against plans to ban unions.
Observer editorial: Unions must call off this provocative strike.
Instead of launching an uprising against authorities, disgruntled workers should take the more civil approach of constructive engagement.
The strike proceeds...to be crushed by armed police. And soldiers.
Scores of fatalities are reported in the underground press. International observers suggest the total could be much higher.
Observer editorial: Both sides must take their share of the blame.
The police could have shown more restraint; but
invective leveled against the government by protesters is demeaning to the entire political process.
James O' Brien: "I just cannot fathom how stupid opponents of the government are actually being.
Protests? Strikes? Hospitalisation? You don't defeat fascists by descending to their level.
You do it by posing superior arguments, in the market place of ideas!".
Telegraph comment: Here's to the heroic workers, who banded together - & refused to strike - triumphing over their evil union representatives by volunteering to work without pay; so that their employers might be the more properly rewarded for the wealth-creating endeavours.
A former member of the government writes in exile: 'I no longer recognise the military dictatorship I served in, for 9 years'.
(cont.) "The restoration of order was all well and good; while cleansing certain neighbourhoods of undesirables was welcome.
But the new re-education programme is jeopardising Britain's reputation for tolerance, and fair play".
Observer comment: If members of the government are concerned about what their dictatorship is becoming, they should speak up now, before it is too late.
The Night of Blunt Knives follows.
Less trusted officials of the regime are deposed, and made to return home, then remain indoors. Until further notice.
He was a controversial figure, certainly; but delightful at dinner parties. I, for one, will miss him dearly.
@BBCPolitics If you want a vision of the future, imagine a human face tutting, and murmuring that 'it's all very unpleasant, but regrettably necessary', forever.
The end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The last time Britain's government openly ignored their duties under international law was way back in...June 2020, when the UN warned them about their failure to replace dangerous cladding on buildings.
In 2015, they were breaching international law by supplying weapons to Saudi Arabia, while its military were committing war crimes in Yemen - a practice which hasn't stopped:
When Black protesters complained to Buttigieg about siding with a white police officer who had killed a Black man, a woman asked if he expected Black people to vote for him - and he replied "I'm not asking for your vote".
It's not really good enough that white Democrats try to exploit the BLM movement, to serve their own political ends, when deep down, few of them care about meaningful change.
In 2015, David Cameron boasted "we’ve taken real steps to fight poverty. This has led to 600,000 adults and 300,000 children being taken out of relative poverty".