Olaf Corry Profile picture
Oct 12, 2019 5 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Very brief thread:
1. Was on Danish @tv2newsdk yesterday with @TroelsMylenberg as Copenhagen hosted the #C40Summit and @antonioguterres and Danish PM @MettePrime spoke to the press. @c40cities

Here's what I can remember saying: Image
2. Since the international track is effectively stymied by the US (and other fossil-lobby captured states) city-level is limited but increasingly important.

Half the world lives in cities (set to rise to 70% by 2050) and 70% of energy consumed is consumed in cities.
3. Danish PM @MettePrime pointed out she is a Social Democrat first - green second. @antonioguterres agreed a #JustTransition is crucial.
I agreed: tactically climate needs broad appeal. Substantively you can't transform world without making a gazillion political prioritizations
4. #Copenhagen with its bikes, green energy and clean water is a great venue for cities leading climate transition processes. Although, like all cities with wealthy people in it, it consumes and emits much more than its fair share. Over-reliance on biomass can't be replicated.
5. The #C40summit won't go down in history as a breakthrough moment, but may be remembered as a staging post on a longer journey, where the climate-agenda continues to broaden from just energy sector decarbonization to full societal transition (food, buildings etc.).
/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Olaf Corry

Olaf Corry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TOClimates

Jan 11
Man skal være en meget stor retoriker - og det er Krasnik bestemt normalt - for a slippe afsted med denne leder om Gaza og retssagen. Men det mislykkes. En tråd 🧵
Vi skal forstå: at anklage Israel for folkemord skubber freden længere væk fordi det "vækker historiske traumer og stærke følelser" - hos Israelere. Det er deres følelser Krasnik kærere sig om, forstås. De skal ikke konfronteres i retten, det er bare 'spektakulært' - et stunt.
Vi i vesten har de sidste 3 måneder ellers forsøgt med den søde tilgang - gået med at sende dem flere våben, penge og holdt hånden over dem i FN, imens de har ifølge Krasnik dræbt "for alt for mange civile" og nok sikkert begået krigsforbydelser og forbrydelser mod menneskeden.
Read 22 tweets
Sep 21, 2020
By coincidence, I read this piece on #geoengineering as 'the only solution' to climate injustice, just after picking up James C. Scott's 'Seeing Like a State' which analyses why some well-intentioned megaprojects have turned really effing lethal. /Thread. wired.com/story/geoengin…
Scott's classic asks why some well-intentioned schemes to improve the human condition have historically failed badly, killing or ruining countless lives ("fiasco" is too lighthearted a word he says). He identifies 4 necessary elements for worthy-but-deadly megaprojects. Here goes
1. Simplificatory schemas to render nature & society 'legible' for bureaucratic & commercial operations. 'Seeing' like this doesn't and isn't supposed to reveal the actual object, "only that slice of [it] that interested the official observer". The rest (most) becomes 'invisible'
Read 9 tweets
Sep 11, 2020
What do 'pandemic politics' suggest about the political environment solar geoengineering might face?

A new comment in Communications Earth and Environment by @hollyjeanbuck @Oliver_Geden Masa Sugayama and myself offers 5 lessons. See Holly's thread 👇
+ here's my summary: /1
We posit "If the concept of stratospheric aerosol injection leaves the realm of modeling, it will be thrust into a multi-societal science–media-policy interface that operates in ways not currently anticipated—at least not in idealized model simulations/ governance scenarios". /2
Five observations:
1. Simple metrics (like R0 or global average temperature) cut through politically, but can gain a life of their own and obscure wider, diverse societal aims and values. /3
Read 7 tweets
Aug 19, 2020
I agree that techno determinism is silly. On the other hand, total fungibility re the societal effects of a technology is also non-credible. The Q is what social and technical futures arise/are likely to be created by a particular tech in a particular social configuration.
A global solar manipulation system with single point delivery (if it were possible) is unlikely to facilitate a more decentralised set of power relations globally. In my view it's also not likely to be created without a concomitant concentration of geopower.
I agree the original binary of compatible/incompatible is
not helpful but in the blog the concept of democracy isn't defined either. If we think democracy is fundamentally about distributing power, then there is a case to say that certain SRM methods don't really excel at it
Read 4 tweets
Jun 18, 2020
Thread/ 1 One of the risks of game theoretic models of policy dilemmas is translation back to real world. Firstly, model set-ups claim to be 'simplification' of a target system but this assumes we know the system's basic form already. Catch-22...
2/ This model of #climate negotiations with #geoengineering it is claimed 'simplifies to the basic form' of climate diplomacy. But how climate diplomacy works is precisely what is in question in this new simulation by @GernotWagner and @adrien_fabre . nature.com/articles/s4159…
3/ Second, assuming this leap of faith (abstraction=simplification of actual real world) exacerbates already substantial risk of slippage IMO, from 'this model world works like this' to 'the target real world works like this'. I think this is an example of such slippage Image
Read 9 tweets
May 15, 2020
There is plenty of racism in Western society and academia in general. More's the pity that a poorly crafted article singling out of Securitization Theory as 'avowedly conservative' (WTF?), anti-black and in the service of white supremacy was published in SD. Bad error.
From Buzan & Wæver's short reply in SD: "if one is interested in ..racism in relation to the formation of securitization theory, the obvious source to examine would be Wæver et al. (1993).(..) This is all about the risks involved in European security turning towards security..
policies on behalf of ‘identities’ and against supranational integration, other national and ethnic identities, and migrants. The explicit formulation of securitization theory grew out of its largely implicit role in this book, which deals with racism in several chapters."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(