A prize to be expected. Banerjee, Duflo & Kremer rely on key tenets of mainstream Econ. While founded on behavioral econ and assumption that tweaks to individual actions can alleviate global poverty, their work is often wrongly presented as purely empirical, objective & radical.
A good a time as any to revisit some critiques of the body of work that this year's laureates have paved the way for. Last year, @farwasial and @cacrisalves wrote a critique of RCTs for @CriticalDev: Why Positive Thinking Won't Get You Out of Poverty 👇
developingeconomics.org/2018/11/09/why…
Angus Deaton and Nancy Cartwright's classic critique, which cautions against simple extrapolations from trials to other contexts, is also worth revisiting.

The Limitations of Randomised Controlled Trials 👇 voxeu.org/article/limita…
Last year leading economists argued in @guardian that the focus on micro-interventions associated with RCTs can do little to alleviate poverty if we fail to also tackle its root causes:

Buzzwords & Tortuous Impact Studies Won't Fix a Broken Aid System 👇
theguardian.com/global-develop…
Related is also Ben Fine et al's critique of behavioral approaches in development from 2015:

Nudging or Fudging 👇 onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
Martin Ravallion's (@MartinRavallion) review of Poor Economics is also worth a read. He questions how far Duflo and Banerjee's approach will get us in the fight against global poverty:

Fighting Poverty One Experiment at a Time 👇
jstor.org/stable/23269972
Sanjay Reddy's (@sanjaygreddy) critique questions the randomistas' ability to explain global poverty and their approach's "technocratic premises, its naïve view of politics and society, and its unselfconscious do-goodism". Check it out:

Randomise This! 👇
ras.org.in/randomise_this…
There's also @N_Kabeer's critique, which questions to what extent RCTs take human agency seriously. Here's an interview with her by @fp2p:

Naila Kabeer on Why Randomized Controlled Trials Need to Include Human Agency 👇

oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/naila-kab…
Jean Drèze's critique is also important, which critiques the concept of "evidence-based policy," arguing that the relation between evidence and policy needs further thought:

Evidence, Policy, and Politics 👇 ideasforindia.in/topics/miscell…
For a political economy perspective, see Bédécarrats (@BedecarratsF), Guérin & Roubaud's article. It explores how RCTs fit w/ contemporary scientific business models & interests of donor communities:

All That Glitters Is Not Gold 👇 doi.org/10.1111/dech.1…
@BedecarratsF Then there's @AHAkramLodhi's critique, which cautions against seeing individual and household choices in isolation from the overall socio-economic structure, dismissing the importance of power and privilege in structuring possibilities.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
@BedecarratsF @AHAkramLodhi This post by @N_Kabeer unpacks how Duflo's approach to gender is problematic. She concludes that perhaps Duflo needs to read some @FeministEcon.

"Esther Duflo on “Women’s Empowerment and Economic Development”: A Must-Read for Feminist Economists?"👇
feministeconomicsposts.iaffe.org/2013/12/19/est…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ingrid H. Kvangraven

Ingrid H. Kvangraven Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ingridharvold

Sep 24, 2020
For those of you who missed it, many of the videos from #AHE2020 are now up on @hetecon's YouTube channel.
youtube.com/channel/UCrha0…

Hope it will inspire many of you to join the heterodox economics movement (and maybe even AHE??) 😊
Opening plenary on #COVID19, Capitalism and the Environment, featuring the brilliant @JKSteinberger @jasonhickel and Chantal Naidoo, chaired by @danielle_guizzo.
I had the pleasure of chairing the panel on Heterodox Economics Globally with inspiring talks captured here by @nssylla and @Drsaalajeng (but unfortunately the beginning of Rama's got lost!).
Read 13 tweets
Aug 3, 2020
Why Do Economists Have Trouble Understanding Racialized Inequalities?

Based on survey data, @SurbhiKesar and I make some observations regarding the Economics discipline and its lack of capacity to deal with race... +
ineteconomics.org/perspectives/b…
We find that economists in mainstream Econ depts are the least likely to teach about racial inequalities & colonialism (see figure). We believe the reason for this is the inadequate manner in which mainstream Econ theorises inequality, and race in particular. +
We argue: "...the discipline falls markedly short of recognizing the structural, historical factors that are central for producing and perpetuating inequality across groups, both in terms of opportunities and outcomes." +
Read 19 tweets
Jul 31, 2020
#AHE2020 as seen from rural Norway. @SurbhiKesar (@working_india) introducing the panel on perspectives from the Global South on Heterodox Economics with a stellar panel calling in from India, Italy and the US. Image
Prabhat Patnaik opens the plenary, speaking on globalization, inequality and economic crisis. #ahe2020 Image
Now @LuGuangMing is presenting on "Bordering the Surplus Population across the Mediterranean: Imperialism and Unfree Labour in Libya and the Italian Countryside". She explains how immigrant workers can be seen as a reserve army allowing farmers to meet low production costs. Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 30, 2020
#AHE2020 starting in one hour!!

Cristina Fróes de Borja Reis (et al.): The economic development of Latin America and its main problems: A Feminist Perspective

@retepelyod: Economics after Slavery

@SurbhiKesar: Economic dualism, precarity, and exclusion

@hetecon
Reis' paper rereads Prebisch's manifesto to break w/its economicism & eurocentrism. It denounces how racial & gender inequalities are at the root of the world system, mirroring the harmful relationship btwn patriarchy, racism & capitalism, which is more perverse in the periphery.
Check out a summary of @retepelyod's paper here on @NIESRorg.
niesr.ac.uk/blog/economics…
Read 12 tweets
Jul 17, 2020
Really happy to have had the opportunity to write a paper on what the effects of and responses to #COVID__19 say about the cracks in the dominant Economics narrative with the brilliant @cacrisalves for @reviewagrarian.

Time for a lil thread. Full paper: ras.org.in/changing_the_n… +
We look at how Econ moved from political economy analysis to an allegedly "exact science" & how this has led to a weakening of the discipline. We connect this to economists' tendency to see #COVID__19 as an "external" shock rather than as connected to our systems of production.+
We then look at the increasingly central role "markets" have come to play in the discipline and how this has narrowed that's considered the “economic sphere.” This market fundamentalism has, in turn, led to a defunding and weakening of public institutions. +
Read 18 tweets
Jun 12, 2020
Last week I wrote about how I think dependency theory can be best understood as a research programme in @DevandChg.

Today I summarize how a dependency programme can be employed to understand global inequalities in the wake of #COVID19!

via @_ourEconomy
opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/…
How is dependency theory particularly relevant now?

First of all, how industry is structured globally still reproduces relations of dependence and leaves workers in developing countries especially exposed during the pandemic.
While global economic integration has deepened, which has been associated with an increase in efficiency and ‘flattening’ of the world, the spread of global value chains involves rigid power imbalances & deep vulnerabilities for those at the bottom of the hierarchy.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(