Can we achieve similar outcomes for lung #SABR in non-academic institutions compared to the major academic centres? This was an important question posed by @drdavidpalma Suresh Senan & @FJLagerwaard. This is a tweetorial to help answer that question. #lcsm#radonc
The cancer centre in Middlesbrough, is a non-academic #NHS institution serving a regional population of 1.1m. It’s one of the most socially deprived areas in the UK. We started lung SABR in 2009 and presented our long term outcomes at @SABRconsortium 2019 meeting #lcsm#radonc
We treated 417 patients over a 10 yr period. SABR technique changed over this time. We introduced 4DCT in 2013 & VMAT in 2014. Prior to this we used a “composite inspiratory/expiratory CT merge” approach, and a 7-field co-planar plans. Doses 54/3, 55/5, 60/8, 50/10 #lcsm#radonc
Overall survival results are as follows, which compare really nicely with Timmerman’s RTOG 0236 trial. #LCSM#Radonc
But remember, 100% of the RTOG 0236 patients were biopsy proven NSCLC, so when you compare to our histology positive patients, we match Bob’s results with 40% 5 year survival. #lcsm#radonc
We also looked at whether clinical experience mattered by comparing outcomes between the different consultants - it didn’t. #lcsm#radonc
We also looked at whether there was a “learning curve” with a crude measure of looking the first 25 patients treated compared to all subsequent patients (for 3 of the consultants who had done enough cases to make comparison). No apparent learning curve #LCSM#radonc
We also compared the different risk-adapted fractionation schedules and 50/10 did badly. No difference between 3, 5, and 8 fractions, though. This supports the >100Gy BED hypothesis. #lcsm#radonc
We then looked at whether new technology like 4DCT and VMAT made a difference to overall survival outcomes - nope! We accept obvious caveat of selection bias during different treatment eras of course. #radonc#lcsm
Bottom line is that lung #SABR to early stage NSCLC can be safely delivered in the non-academic setting with comparable results to major academic institutions. However, training in the technique is essential. Use of @SABRconsortium guidelines & @RTTQA_UK guidance also key #radonc
All UK radiotherapy institutions should be allowed to offer lung #SABR with appropriate training. “Buddying” with more experienced centres can help achieve this. With level one evidence showing superiority of SABR over conventional RT, there is no longer any excuse #LCSM#radonc
We have submitted our work to the All Party Parliamentary Group on Radiotherapy who have used it to support the roll out of SABR to all UK radiotherapy centres.
We also believe that although IGRT capability is essential, 4DCT & VMAT are “desirable” rather than crucial. This has important implications for countries around the world with less access to technology. With OS curves like this, getting SABR is more important than “perfect SABR”
Finally, thanks to Dr Alex Wood, a medical student who did his elective with me and put all the data together earlier this year. He’s now qualified and working on the #NHS frontline. Thanks to all the SABR team in the ‘Boro too! #radonc#lcsm
Happy to answer any questions...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The #NHS is actually quite easy to improve. This is how you do it: 1. Vote out the Tories 2. Focus on the social determinants of health. Wealth inequality causes health inequality. Tax unearned wealth (rentier billionaires & tax evaders) 3. Invest and promote public health
4. Understand that health spending has a fiscal multiplier effect and promotes economic growth 5. Invest in social care services 6. Use monopsony (dominant buyer in healthcare market) power of NHS for procurement of drugs and medical technology 7. Abolish purchaser-provider split
8. Invest in General Practice and community services. GPs & community nurses play an incredibly important “gatekeeper” role. 9. Promote role of community pharmacists in managing common and mild illness eg viral infections 10. Ensure clinician involvement in all major IT projects
THREAD on #Consultants #Strike:
As a consultant oncologist, this is how I am going to support the strike:
I will work tomorrow because I have 2 MDTs, which can’t be cancelled because it would delay cancer treatment decisions by a week for about 80 patients. 1/
On Friday I have cancelled my radiotherapy planning clinic and my afternoon follow up clinic. I will enjoy a long weekend. However, all the patients will get seen tomorrow instead, with an extra ad hoc clinic and remote radiotherapy planning. 2/
I will lose a day’s pay on Friday, but I am going to claim BMA rates for my extra ad hoc clinic work, which will be paid at 3-4x my normal hourly rate. Hence cancer patients will not experience any delay or harm, and I will be financially better off!! 3/
THREAD: A tribute to Simon Stevens, outgoing #NHS CEO.
When I first heard Simon Stevens was going to be CEO of the NHS, I was convinced he was going to accelerate the privatisation of the NHS, as he was appointed by a Tory Government, and was formerly CEO of UnitedHealth 1/11
Over time, he has proved me wrong. In fact, I now believe he did an enormous amount of work to slow down #NHS privatisation, despite the concerted efforts of Lansley and Hunt to drive forward a Tory market driven agenda 2/11
He effectively ignored large swathes of Lansley’s Health and Social Care Act legislation, and broadly favoured NHS collaboration over competition & marketisation. He listened to the concerns of clinical leaders over and above his political masters 3/11
THREAD: We were a few hundred thousand votes away from the most powerful and militarized nation on earth becoming an authoritarian dictatorship. We must understand why we got so this close to this disaster. /1
In my opinion this is a direct result of neoliberal ideology, which has resulted in gross wealth inequality. The gap between rich & poor is higher than ever, leading to a large proportion of the population being left behind with poor prospects & enduring very difficult lives. /2
This leads to resentment, social unrest and distrust of Government. The appetite for scapegoats and blame is then ripe for manipulation by conspiracy theory and disinformation. The ideal environment to fuel right wing nationalism. /3
I disagree with the Barrington declaration for the following reasons:
1 We don’t know enough about natural history of #COVID19 eg what are long term complications? risks of re-infection? severity of re-infection?
2 Spread can occur via asymptomatic cases, increasing transmission
3. You can’t effectively cocoon the elderly population. Younger people live with, work with, and look after older people 4. Infection spreads like wildfire through care homes and nursing homes. It’s devastating 5. If R number gets out of control, the health system will collapse
6. High numbers of infections will also increase sickness absence from work, with damaging economic costs 7. #COVID19 disproportionately affects the poorest regions in the country
As a cancer specialist I think it’s important to respond to the #HealthSecretary’s comments about cancer treatment not being available if #COVID19 gets out of control. Firstly, it’s important to state that #Hancock and his own Government’s failures have contributed to the problem
Secondly, I think it’s unlikely that those in most need will miss out. We have learnt an enormous amount about managing cancer in a #COVID19 environment and are now much better prepared. At present we are managing generally very well, although surgical waiting lists are a problem
Non surgical cancer treatment like chemotherapy and radiotherapy is mainly outpatient based and we should be able to cope. Initial concerns about risks to patients on chemo have not turned out to be as serious as we first thought.