The travel ban has divided the U.S. and prevented many U.S. citizens from getting to see their friends and loved ones from “banned” countries. forbes.com/sites/stuartan…
@karinfischer American colleges rely on talented students from abroad to fill graduate programs, particularly in the sciences. But in 2017, for the first time in a decade, international student enrollment was down.
Not only does this affect foreign students, it impacts U.S. universities and students who stand to benefit from funding and enrollment from diverse, promising students from across the world.
As @NAFSA has noted, the 1M international students that attend U.S. universities yield an estimated economic impact of $36.9 billion and support 450,000 U.S. jobs. acenet.edu/News-Room/Page…
The travel ban is also holding U.S. medical and scientific fields back by keeping talent out of our country. As @sarareardon wrote in @sciam, Iranian scientists felt the effects of the ban immediately after it was implemented. scientificamerican.com/article/how-th…
Perhaps the most directly impacted field is that of medicine. Nearly a quarter of practicing physicians in the U.S. are graduates of foreign medical schools. huffpost.com/entry/opinion-…?
Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen — six of the seven countries originally banned — account for more than 7,000 physicians practicing in the United States. niskanencenter.org/trumps-travel-…
And the clincher: Doctors from banned countries are more likely to practice in areas experiencing physician shortages, notes @SamPeak.
After the travel ban was implemented in 2017, the U.S. saw a drop in residency applications to medical schools. And there was another drop in 2018, after the 2nd iteration of the ban. nrmp.org/wp-content/upl…
Yes, we have to keep America safe. But it’s telling that dozens of national security experts have come out against the travel ban. #NationalSecuritynpr.org/2018/04/24/604…
Here’s the simple fact: banning people based solely on their country goes against our American principles. It’s an overly-simplistic approach to national security. And it comes at a massive cost to our culture, economy, and industries. #AmericaFirst
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@heritage publishes regular iterations of its “Mandate for Leadership” with an agenda for the next Republican administration. The prior Trump admin implemented nearly 64% of its recommendations in its 1st year.
First, the Mandate would effectively close many avenues of legal immigration by:
❌Halting H2 visa programs
❌Closing the H-1B visa program to most recent grads
❌Leveraging entire visa categories as collateral in foreign policy negotiations
It would sabotage U.S. humanitarian relief by:
❌Repealing all TPS designations, stripping almost 700,000 of legal protection + work authorization.
❌Forbidding use of DHS staff time on DACA, Uniting for Ukraine, etc.
❌Prohibiting refugee vetting, ending refugee resettlement.
NEW PAPER: Manufactured housing is an affordable option in rural areas where land prices are low. They even promise to ease the housing crunch in coastal cities where land prices are high!
To clarify, we’re not talking about vacation trailers, or 1970’s-era mobile homes. Modern manufactured homes have strict standards for structural integrity and safety. They often look like homes built on-site, but they were assembled in a factory, like a car or an airplane.
Benefits of manufactured homes include: (1) They’re safer and more efficient to make, their materials don’t have to be exposed to the elements until the house is fully assembled, and (3) they can help improve quality of housing while driving costs down.
Before we enact any reform, we have to understand the political economy of our system: whom it empowers, whom it enriches, etc.
Answering these questions will rally opinion shapers around reform, protect reforms against backlash, and help avoid unintended consequences.
Here's how the conventional wisdom explains the political economy of housing: single-family homes and large lot sizes restrict the availability of housing to buyers who will pay at least as much in local taxes as they consume in public services, such as schools.
THREAD: The cost of building public transit is out of control. We can do something about that:
Stop relying on outside consultants to do the work of government agencies. slate.com/business/2023/…
In the name of cutting costs, we’ve hollowed out government agencies, asking full-time employees to handle impossible tasks.
The result? Chaos. And lots of wasted taxpayer dollars. (After all, government contractors arguably cost even more money).
.@alon_levy produced a report for us outlining some solutions:
(1) The federal government should require that state/local transportation agencies demonstrate they already have the capacity to oversee big infrastructure projects before releasing funds. niskanencenter.org/report-so-you-…