It's a disastrous day for our democracy. Forgive the long thread. Short version: any candidate who thinks we can just go back to how things were pre-Trump is dangerously deluded.
This vote is both devastating & unsurprising. Republicans aren't interested in truth. They're interested in saving their own political hides. What this sham trial demonstrates is a clear and terrible truth: the threat to our democracy is much, much bigger than just Donald Trump.
That shouldn’t be a surprise. We’ve seen the warning signs for a long time. We saw Mitch McConnell stonewall President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland.
We saw it when McConnell went on the floor of the U.S. Senate to call voting rights “socialism” and a “power grab.” msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-…
We saw it when House Republicans worked in lock step to oppose all election security legislation. thehill.com/policy/technol…
We saw it when Republicans demanded congress haul Biden’s own son into the impeachment proceedings. reuters.com/article/us-usa…
But what more proof do you need than this senate impeachment "trial." Republican Senators are voting not just to acquit an obviously guilty Trump, but against even allowing witnesses in the trial?? It's f'ing astonishing.
Trump isn’t the problem. The problem is much worse.
I can't watch these events without seeing how two significantly different world views are being debated in the Dem presidential primary right now.
I started the week with Jill Lepore's piece in the @NewYorker. Lepore covers the last world-wide crisis in democracy in the 1930s. Mussolini and Hitler were rising, young democracies were crumbling, and America was confronting its own crisis of confidence. newyorker.com/magazine/2020/…
My favorite part is this line. We can all debate whether and how democracy is is dying. But politics isn't something that just happens. Politics is what WE DO. We shouldn't just complain about the political storms - it's up to us to go out and stop the rain.
After we launched the Indivisible Pledge (which all major candidates have signed!), we started asking how Indivisibles should move forward with the primary. We landed on candidate Scorecard, which we launched in December. scorecard.indivisible.org
To score candidates, we worked up a lengthy questionnaire with a big emphasis on democracy. What are candidates’ plans for reforming our democracy? How bold are their solutions? How high on their priority list are these reforms?
Warren scores highest overall and in the democracy category. Makes sense given her campaign’s focus on corruption. Unsurprisingly, she’s spent her time at the impeachment trial drawing the same connections.
As for other candidates, Buttigieg is lower overall but not far behind on democracy. Sanders, Steyer, & Klobuchar all have less expansive visions for democracy or place less of a priority on it - but they still get a 70+ score on this metric.
Way down at the bottom of the democracy ranking is Biden. When asked in a recent New York Times interview which of the big democracy reforms proposed by other candidates he supported, he gave a simple direct response: “None.”
Biden is also the only major candidate to decline to respond to Indivisible’s questionnaire at all. Every single other candidate put their thoughts down on paper when asked how they would save our democracy. Biden wouldn't.
Biden has a pretty simple analysis: the problem is Trump. Once we get rid of him, all will go back to normal. Just a couple weeks ago, Biden predicted that McConnell would become “mildly cooperative” once Trump is gone.
The impeachment trial vote should shake everyone out of any illusion that we can go back to the way things were. Don't listen to me, listen to a former senior GOP staffer on this:
One side is rigging the rules to entrench their power. They’re rigging it against an increasingly diverse, unequal electorate that wants policies that actually reflect the will of the people. They were rigging it before Trump and they will continue rigging it after him.
I'll work my ass off to elect whoever the nominee ends up being. And we've got several candidates who are well positioned to beat Trump. I'd just encourage you if you get a chance to ask your top picks about their plans for saving democracy after Trump. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some folks think Indivisible started in response to Trump - but that’s only half true. We really decide to start Indivisible in response to feckless Dem leadership at the outset of an authoritarian surge. Here's why that’s still needed... thehill.com/homenews/senat…
After shelving BBB this week, Biden and Senate Dems said they were going to pursue voting rights “aggressively” for the rest of the year. And then just about 24 hours later, we learned they were going to go on vacation.
The only good news from this garbage week is that we're closer to filibuster/democracy reform than we've ever been. In the Senate, there was real progress - three holdouts endorsed filibuster reform: Warner, Hickenlooper, and Hassan. More have done so privately. We're close.
Two must-read articles this #FilibusterFriday with the good/bad of where we stand on democracy reform. 1) The Good: @Grace_Segers on how congressional leadership is actively working to get to the finish line on filibuster reform and democracy. newrepublic.com/article/164582…
Trump packed the court with anti-choice zealots explicitly for this purpose. Short thread on what Dems *could* do in response... nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Trump wasn't coy about it - he told the public (and GOP senators like Susan Collins) exactly what he was doing.
The court has been packed, politicized, and perverted. The solution to this problem is not just "win elections," or "replace retiring justices," or even "pass democracy reform." You have to reform the institution itself or the answer to Sotomayor's question is clearly "No."
Everybody who is not Sinema/Manchin should be FURIOUS now. We can have fights on policy - that’s normal. That’s NOT what’s happening here. Sinema/Manchin AGREED to the reconciliation top-line. THAT AGREEMENT is what got the BIF 69 votes in the Senate. Short angry thread...
Without that agreement on reconciliation, the BIF would never have gotten through the senate. We know this because 11 Senate Democrats signed a letter saying passing BIF without the reconciliation bill would be QUOTE “in violation of that agreement.” thehill.com/policy/finance…
This is easy math. Take out those 11 senate votes and what do you get for BIF? 58 votes - not enough to clear the dumb filibuster hurdle of 60. BIF is DEAD without those 11 votes. And the way Sinema/Manchin GOT them was by promising a reconciliation bill along with BIF.
In July, we set a deadline for democracy for the senate to pass the For the People Act before August recess. They just blew past it. Here's my read on what that means and what our options are. Three points to pull out: [short thread] indivisibleteam.medium.com/we-blew-past-t…
1) Missing this deadline means that the anti-gerrymandering provision in the bill is more likely to fail an inevitable court challenge. So the GOP is more likely to succeed in rigging maps next year. That is an unavoidable consequence of missing the deadline. This simply sucks.
2) The bill at large and even the gerrymandering provision isn't dead. All Dems voted for it early this morning, and Schumer committed to taking it up as soon as recess is over. If the Senate Dems eliminate the filibuster and pass the bill, there is a ton of good it can still do.
The President has not given one single speech or held one single event focused on passing the For the People Act. Where the hell is he on saving our democracy?
My hope is that he changes course, but so far that hasn't happened. Some thoughts on the state of things:
Pelosi has prioritized the For the People Act. It passed the House months ago. Schumer says "Failure is not an option" and wrangled 50 votes to move to debate.
There will be a fight on the bill and filibuster reform this month.
Meanwhile, the president is just totally MIA.
Last week, the White House promised more engagement on democracy. Since then...bupkis. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.
While the democracy burns, the President is trying to build bridges with chief arsonist Mitch McConnell.