Americans should not be confident about security of the 2020 election, our experts panel says. Today's Cybersecurity 202 w/ @TonyaJoRiley: washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost…
@TonyaJoRiley “There are no signs that any part of our institutions are capable of providing an election that is reasonably secure from tampering and manipulation,” -- @daveaitel
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel “Every part of the voting process is vulnerable. This includes the voter registration process, the voting itself, the vote tabulation, and the results-reporting system,” -- @schneierblog
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog “Although a lot of progress has been made, there are still significant vulnerabilities and dedicated adversaries bent on undermining our elections and democracy more generally,” -- @C_Painter
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog @C_Painter Many blamed Congress and GOP leaders for failing to mandate election security reforms. “The Senate majority leader has blocked every attempt to give authority and resources... and is responsible for what happens in November.” -- @alexstamos
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog @C_Painter Others pointed to the Iowa caucus debacle. “The Iowa debacle and Nevada's last-minute changes to their processes suggest we are not ready for the 2020 primaries. If we can't fix systems before the general election, Americans should be deeply concerned." @BetsOnTech
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog @C_Painter @BetsOnTech 43% of respondents said Americans should be confident in 2020 security. “We have invested in our state and local elections authorities … Americans should go to the ballot box in November confident that their votes will be counted.” -- Rep. @JimLangevin
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog @C_Painter @BetsOnTech @JimLangevin But many of them still had reservations. “We are considerably better off than we were four years ago. However, the threat to the electoral infrastructure and the possibility that the public will lose confidence in the process remains very real." -- @CyAlliancePrez
@TonyaJoRiley @daveaitel @schneierblog @C_Painter @BetsOnTech @JimLangevin @CyAlliancePrez And experts on both sides stressed Americans should not be so fearful of election interference they don’t participate. “Should Americans be concerned about election security? Yes. Should this keep Americans away from the polls? No!” -- @j_winterton

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joseph Marks

Joseph Marks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Joseph_Marks_

18 Nov
And it's official. This comes after a week of rumors Trump would fire @CISAKrebs -- essentially for not backing the president's baseless claims of election fraud. He's scheduled to speak publicly at two events tomorrow. We'll see how that goes.
FWIW, Krebs has made several statements affirming the election was free of significant cyberattacks and fraud. Here's the most recent - after rumors of his imminent sacking were already swirling.
Along with @CISAgov staff, he essentially built DHS's election security program from scratch since '16, helping state election officials dramatically improve their cyber defenses in a remarkably bipartisan way. D and R Dem Secstates respect him immensely.
Read 8 tweets
7 Oct
This is somehow still going, so I’m going to reluctantly clarify.
1.This was meant to be funny. I don’t care how much you swear on Twitter.
2. It was aimed at a few dozen cyber and election security policy folks whose tweets I sometimes embed and who I also speak w/ frequently. Most of them have told me to f*** off in the comments (I hope/ think also humorously).
3.If you don’t know me and we’ve never spoken I’ve almost certainly never embedded any of your tweets. Prove me wrong and I’ll buy you a drink of your choice.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jun
.@RonWyden exercising the nuclear (rhetoric) option in a new Medium post. "If Congress and states don’t act immediately, our country could face an electoral Chernobyl this fall." medium.com/@RonWyden/figh…
Here's the closer: "If Americans see a repeat of what happened in Georgia across the country, many will rightfully question whether the results — and by extension, the government itself — are truly legitimate."
FWIW, I think this post reflects a problem with talking about election security and cybersecurity generally. The rhetoric and analogies started so hot (cyber-9/11; cyber-Pearl Harbor) that it's tough to draw attention to something that's truly horrifying.
Read 4 tweets
23 Mar 18
Just in: Treasury Sanctions Iranian Cyber Actors for Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities Targeting Hundreds of Universities:
Cyber sanctions vs. one Iranian entity and 10 Iranian nationals.
The entity is the Mabna Institute, which "conducted massive, coordinated cyber intrusions into computer systems belonging to at least approximately 144 United States-based universities, in addition to at least 176 universities located in 21 foreign countries"
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!