@TonyaJoRiley “There are no signs that any part of our institutions are capable of providing an election that is reasonably secure from tampering and manipulation,” -- @daveaitel
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel “Every part of the voting process is vulnerable. This includes the voter registration process, the voting itself, the vote tabulation, and the results-reporting system,” -- @schneierblog
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel@schneierblog “Although a lot of progress has been made, there are still significant vulnerabilities and dedicated adversaries bent on undermining our elections and democracy more generally,” -- @C_Painter
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel@schneierblog@C_Painter Many blamed Congress and GOP leaders for failing to mandate election security reforms. “The Senate majority leader has blocked every attempt to give authority and resources... and is responsible for what happens in November.” -- @alexstamos
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel@schneierblog@C_Painter Others pointed to the Iowa caucus debacle. “The Iowa debacle and Nevada's last-minute changes to their processes suggest we are not ready for the 2020 primaries. If we can't fix systems before the general election, Americans should be deeply concerned." @BetsOnTech
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel@schneierblog@C_Painter@BetsOnTech 43% of respondents said Americans should be confident in 2020 security. “We have invested in our state and local elections authorities … Americans should go to the ballot box in November confident that their votes will be counted.” -- Rep. @JimLangevin
And it's official. This comes after a week of rumors Trump would fire @CISAKrebs -- essentially for not backing the president's baseless claims of election fraud. He's scheduled to speak publicly at two events tomorrow. We'll see how that goes.
FWIW, Krebs has made several statements affirming the election was free of significant cyberattacks and fraud. Here's the most recent - after rumors of his imminent sacking were already swirling.
Along with @CISAgov staff, he essentially built DHS's election security program from scratch since '16, helping state election officials dramatically improve their cyber defenses in a remarkably bipartisan way. D and R Dem Secstates respect him immensely.
2. It was aimed at a few dozen cyber and election security policy folks whose tweets I sometimes embed and who I also speak w/ frequently. Most of them have told me to f*** off in the comments (I hope/ think also humorously).
3.If you don’t know me and we’ve never spoken I’ve almost certainly never embedded any of your tweets. Prove me wrong and I’ll buy you a drink of your choice.
.@RonWyden exercising the nuclear (rhetoric) option in a new Medium post. "If Congress and states don’t act immediately, our country could face an electoral Chernobyl this fall." medium.com/@RonWyden/figh…
Here's the closer: "If Americans see a repeat of what happened in Georgia across the country, many will rightfully question whether the results — and by extension, the government itself — are truly legitimate."
FWIW, I think this post reflects a problem with talking about election security and cybersecurity generally. The rhetoric and analogies started so hot (cyber-9/11; cyber-Pearl Harbor) that it's tough to draw attention to something that's truly horrifying.
Just in: Treasury Sanctions Iranian Cyber Actors for Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities Targeting Hundreds of Universities:
Cyber sanctions vs. one Iranian entity and 10 Iranian nationals.
The entity is the Mabna Institute, which "conducted massive, coordinated cyber intrusions into computer systems belonging to at least approximately 144 United States-based universities, in addition to at least 176 universities located in 21 foreign countries"