And it's official. This comes after a week of rumors Trump would fire @CISAKrebs -- essentially for not backing the president's baseless claims of election fraud. He's scheduled to speak publicly at two events tomorrow. We'll see how that goes.
FWIW, Krebs has made several statements affirming the election was free of significant cyberattacks and fraud. Here's the most recent - after rumors of his imminent sacking were already swirling.
Along with @CISAgov staff, he essentially built DHS's election security program from scratch since '16, helping state election officials dramatically improve their cyber defenses in a remarkably bipartisan way. D and R Dem Secstates respect him immensely.
Statements and/or tweets out praising @C_C_Krebs from Dem SecStates in Calif., Vt., Minn. and Ct. so far. None from GOP secretaries.
Similarly, lots of Dem lawmakers praising Krebs and slamming Trump. Only GOP statement I've seen is from @SenatorBurr He called Krebs/ CISA’s work “essential in protecting the 2020 U.S. presidential election against threats of foreign interference.”
Another GOP statement from Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), a co-chair of the Cyber Solarium Commission -
From the Democratic Association of Secretaries of State:
"We denounce President Trump’s firing of Chris Krebs. Chris Krebs spoke truth to power, the 2020 elections were safe, secure and legitimate." Say's Trump's "actions are dangerous and only work to weaken our democracy."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. It was aimed at a few dozen cyber and election security policy folks whose tweets I sometimes embed and who I also speak w/ frequently. Most of them have told me to f*** off in the comments (I hope/ think also humorously).
3.If you don’t know me and we’ve never spoken I’ve almost certainly never embedded any of your tweets. Prove me wrong and I’ll buy you a drink of your choice.
.@RonWyden exercising the nuclear (rhetoric) option in a new Medium post. "If Congress and states don’t act immediately, our country could face an electoral Chernobyl this fall." medium.com/@RonWyden/figh…
Here's the closer: "If Americans see a repeat of what happened in Georgia across the country, many will rightfully question whether the results — and by extension, the government itself — are truly legitimate."
FWIW, I think this post reflects a problem with talking about election security and cybersecurity generally. The rhetoric and analogies started so hot (cyber-9/11; cyber-Pearl Harbor) that it's tough to draw attention to something that's truly horrifying.
@TonyaJoRiley “There are no signs that any part of our institutions are capable of providing an election that is reasonably secure from tampering and manipulation,” -- @daveaitel
@TonyaJoRiley@daveaitel “Every part of the voting process is vulnerable. This includes the voter registration process, the voting itself, the vote tabulation, and the results-reporting system,” -- @schneierblog
Just in: Treasury Sanctions Iranian Cyber Actors for Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities Targeting Hundreds of Universities:
Cyber sanctions vs. one Iranian entity and 10 Iranian nationals.
The entity is the Mabna Institute, which "conducted massive, coordinated cyber intrusions into computer systems belonging to at least approximately 144 United States-based universities, in addition to at least 176 universities located in 21 foreign countries"