Ms McKenzie is talking about how diagnostic overshadowing happens in disability accommodation as well as healthcare settings - support workers may not help people get to the doctor in the first place if they think they're seeing a behavioural issue, not a symptom. #DisabilityRC
We heard from Community Visitors during the Melbourne hearing on group homes, as well. They are a part of trying to compensate for the risks associated with social isolation in congregate care.
To catch up on what we mean when we talk about congregate care, institutions and group homes, check out the Housing section of our DRC Jargon Buster: pwd.org.au/drc-hub/jargon…
Ms Porter notes that people who live in group homes often have no choice about their GP, who is selected for the convenience of staff or management - usually someone local who will do home visits, and see everyone at that group home.
One example of problems arising from that lack of choice - women with complex sexual trauma may prefer a female GP, but the GP that's convenient for staff happens to be male, and the person with disability's needs are not considered.
The Commission asks Ms Porter what she can do about it if she brings this sort of thing up with group home management and they won't act on it.
Ms Porter says she's "hamstrung" - all she can do is raise it with the Ageing and Disability Commission. #DisabilityRC
Ms McKenzie says there are referral processes for complaints like that - for NDIS providers, they have to refer it to the NDIS Commission, and it's then their responsibility.
Ms McKenzie says they are currently having some issues where they've referred complaints to the #NDIS Commission, but they can't find out what happens from there - they are told there are privacy concerns. They're trying to resolve this now.
She says complaints that are being referred to the NDIS Commission are usually fairly serious, have already gone through mediation, and need urgent action.
Ms McKenzie says this is particularly an issue with sexual and reproductive health - the people filling out the paperwork are clearly not prioritising it.
Often it says the patient refused an examination, and there's no evidence anyone has tried to help that person access necessary assessments and treatments in an alternative way.
There are tools and resources out there to help people overcome anxiety about tests and medical appointments, but staff don't know about them and make no effort to find out.
And there's no attention to rostering, making sure there's a familiar staff member there for the appointment - sometimes it's a casual the person has never met before, which increases their anxiety.
Good practice for support staff is associated with quality management and oversight. Some services have team leaders that support their staff to prepare and do that work successfully, and some are just chaotic.
There are concerns about some of the newer providers since the launch of the NDIS - their policies and procedures are inadequate, their staff aren't qualified and don't understand the needs of people with disability.
And when people are going into hospital - a good hospital plan gives hospital staff ciritical information about the person's history and communication needs, but sometimes people just get put in an ambulance and sent to an unfamiliar hospital with unfamiliar staff.
Some time ago work was done to create joint guidelines with a template for hospital support plans. An evaluation done a few years ago found poor uptake - the guidelines were there but services and hospitals weren't using them.
Mr Porter says there's a lot of variability in implementation of plans that do exist - exmaple of someone who needs eating support and hospital food is just put in front of them and then taken away again.
Ms McKenzie: Hospital staff often think disability services are medical settings staffed by nurses, so their discharge advice isn't appropriate for the people who are meant to implement it.
Dr J is a medical specialist in palliative care, who has been practicing for over 20 years. She has an interest in patients with intellectual disability and has seen patients in many settings including group homes. She now works in a teaching hospital.
She wants to talk about how the health system undertreats, mistreats, neglects and abuses some patients with intellectual disability. She has found adults with ID referred to her for palliative care much earlier than appropriate - sometimes before any treatment.
Dr J is very concerned that patients for whom radiotherapy or chemotherapy would have been appropriate are being referred to her for palliative care instead. She has recommended more active treatment for some of her patients.
She says the current system of general practice doesn't allow enough time to properly evaluate and look after the needs of patients with intellectual disability.
Dr J's statement presents several examples of mistreated patients.
A woman in her 60s came to Emergency with heavy cervical bleeding. She was sent for a biopsy and then home, with the suggestion that if she comes back it should be to palliative care.
Her notes said she had "the mental age of a five-year-old" which is not an appropriate way to talk about intellectual disability. Her GP's number was recorded wrong, but Dr J found the right number and talked to him to find out important info including meds.
The woman successfully went through radiation under Dr J's recommendation, despite other medical staff being skeptical that she would comply just because of her disability.
In another case, a man with intellectual disability later turned out to have cancer, but the GP kept telling his sister, who brought him in, that it was just haemorrhoids and there was no need to do any tests.
Case 3 - a young man with a skin tumour referred for palliative care. The particular cancer isn't curable, but chemo can keep it down for a long time. The doctor told his parents he wouldn't tolerate chemo, without really thinking about possible adjustments.
Dr J had to do some diplomacy to get the patient a second opinion. He's turned out to respond very well to a new immunotherapy treatment. Dr J feels that first decision was based on his intellectual disability.
Case 4 - a patient whose catheter kept getting infected, normally treated with antibiotics, but on this occasion the doctor sent him back to his group home with morphine instead.
This was a unilateral decision to move from (effective) treatment to palliative care, in an emergency context, without consulting the patient or his family.
Dr J also notes that she hasn't seen as many patients with intellectual disability as she should have, based on statistics - implying that people who do need palliative care might not be getting it.
Dr J also has a son with autism and intellectual disability, who has trouble communicating about pain he experiences. She has been told that his autism is "too severe" to admit him to a child psychiatric ward in an emergency.
They put him in a medical ward with a security guard because there was apparently no appropriate place to put him. The security guard's presence was not helpful for his mental health.
Dr J gives an example of a patient who was screaming loudly on a ward and everyone just ignored it because "he has a disability" - not thinking that something still had to be wrong for him to be screaming like that.
AAJ: There needs to be mandatory training. Medical staff are overloaded with optional training modules and they just don't get through them unless it's mandatory.
She says patients with intellectual disability face a profound struggle in the healthcare system from the moment they are born to the moment they die, and people need to stop ignoring it, because they deserve so
much more.
@FrancesPWDA Jayne is talking about the health system in the UK, and their movement towards being more inclusive and accessible. This was done by legislation.
@FrancesPWDA She says that even after Sarah's death, she has had to deal with collecting the right information and continually dealing with conflciting information from the service providers and NDIS.
Grant was discharged with the broken femur. He was placed into physiotherapy.
The physiotherapist struggled with helping Grant, she spoke harshly. Grant wouldn't do as she asked because of this. She didn't try to find an alternate way to help Grant.
In August 2014, Grant suffered a stroke and was taken to the hospital again. The medical staff conducted some tests to diagnose the stroke, and he remained in the hospital for a while.
At this visit, there were several instances where the staff would not listen.
Another critique comes up about the communication between palliative care and paramedics.
They speak of the night of Grant's death, and trying to deal with the paramedics and the police while trying to get a hold of palliative care after hours,
Getting ready to live tweet the last day of the #DisabilityRC hearing into the use of psychotropic medication and chemical restraints.
It's been a tough week, so if you need to mute this thread of the hashtag, we do understand.
If you feel impacted by anything you read here today, remember you can always call Lifeline on 13 11 14.
You can also call the National Counselling and Referral Service (specifically set up to support people impacted by anything related to the #DisabilityRC) on 1800 421 468.
We have been very disappointed so far with the lack of people with disability giving evidence at this hearing, and we'd like to start this thread today by sharing three blogs written for us by people with lived experience of the mental health system. #DisabilityRC
Getting ready to live tweet the #DisabilityRC again this morning. Thanks to everyone following along this week. Some of the testimony is confronting to hear, and we appreciate everyone engaging with us this week.
As always, if you need support, you can reach Lifeline on 13 11 14.
You can also call the National Counselling and Referral Service, set up to support anyone impacted by anything related to the #DisabilityRC, on 1800 421 468.
@FrancesPWDA is live tweeting this morning's #DisabilityRC sessions. You can follow the thread here:
It's day 2 of the Disability Royal Commission into "the use of psychotropic medication, behaviour support and behaviours of concern". We'll be live tweeting from here again today using the hashtag #DisabilityRC
We heard some harrowing testimony yesterday and we encourage everyone to look after yourselves as we go through this together.
We invite you to follow along on the journey with us, but also remember you can temporarily mute the hashtag or a thread if you need to. #DisabilityRC
@FrancesPWDA will be live tweeting for us from her account this morning. Check out the thread here:
The 6th Disability Royal Commission hearing on "the use of psychotropic medication, behaviour support and behaviours of concern" starts today at 10am, and we will be live tweeting the proceedings from here.
We'll be using the hashtag #DisabilityRC if you'd like to join us.