The Labour Party has to change massively if it's ever going to win.
So those of us who criticised what Labour had become or even those who voted for parties that were closer to where Labour SHOULD be, were arguably the MOST faithful to Labour's values.
Attacking people for that?
So those of us who criticised what Labour had become or even those who voted for parties that were closer to where Labour SHOULD be, were arguably the MOST faithful to Labour's values.
Attacking people for that?
Put simply: If Labour supported the death penalty, ending NHS and fox hunting in an election, would it make sense for the next leadership to sideline those who criticised them for it?
Is it right to support a movement no matter what it does? Or is that morally terrifying?
Is it right to support a movement no matter what it does? Or is that morally terrifying?
Shakespeare once said "A rose (🌹), by any other name would still smell as sweet". In this case, you can keep calling it a rose if you want, but if it smelled like an europhobic, antisemitic, cultish daisy, it wasn't a rose anymore.
