A question I often get. Why Lupus patients that have taken Hydroxychloroquine for years have no side effects whereas severe adverse cardiac side effects are described #COVID19 patients under hydroxychloroquine treatment? Let's have a closer look
Let's start with #COVID19. Does #COVID19 causes cardiac effects? The answer is yes from 2 published surveys from Wuhan hospitals. First one reports on 416 hospitalized patients -> 19.7% with myocardial injury + ⬆️cardiac troponin & high mortality rate 51% jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac…
The second paper shows similar observation on 187 hospitalized patients -> 27% had cardiac injury with again elevation of cardiac troponin and increase mortality rate at 59%. In short #COVID19 leads to significant cardiac injury but these are severe cases jamanetwork.com/journals/jamac…
More relevant to milder #COVID19 cases, A recent cohort study describes the incidence of ECG abnormalities and myocarditis (heart inflammation) on 84 patients -> 16% had ECG abnormalities and 5% with clinical diagnosis of myocarditis. medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
In short, #COVID19 gives either myocarditis or cardiac injuries at a prevalence of 4 to 15% dependent on the severity of the infection.. Of course we do need large scale studies to have a better idea of the prevalence of #COVID19 cardiac effects.
What about Hydroxychloroquine?
It is known for decade that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) gives cardiac side effects such as prolonged QT or torsades de pointes. Many lupus patients have takeen HCQ (usually 200 mg/day) for years and very few cardiac side effects have been reported. There are 2 explanations for this
Firstly HCQ cardiac toxicity is dose dependent. Lupus patients take usually a low dose (200 mg/day) whereas the protocols for #COVID19 oscillate between 400 mg to 800 mg/day for 7 days. increase dose significantly logically increases the risk of cardiac toxicity
Secondly Cardia side effects from auto immune patients taking long term HCQ are often under reported. A recent systematic review concluded that of cardiac side effects are rare but non reversible. However, caution, large scale studies are warranted link.springer.com/article/10.100…
What about now the association #COVID19 and Hydroxychloroquine? While we have no large scale studies yet, one study to date showed that in this cohort of 84 hospitalized patients, 11% #COVID19 treated patients with HCQ developed severe arrhythmia
Additionally, HCQ is associated with Azithromycin to treat #COVID19 infection. To complicate more the matter, Azithromycin gives also cardiac side effects such as QT prolongation ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Therefore the cocktail Hydroxychloroquine in high dose + Azithromycin on #COVID19 patient is explosive for the heart and it is therefore not surprising to see increase reporting of severe adverse events due to HCQ treatment in #COVID19 patients
As always in medicine, there is a balance benefit/risk analysis providing a specific treatment for a disease. This is valid for Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin or all others potential treatments or repurposed drugs against #COVID19
Final words on this. 1/ There is currently no miracle drugs against #COVID19 2/ Most importantly preventive measure such as #Social_Distancing, #WashYourHands and a lot of tests will be by large the most effective treatment against #COVID19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two results came out today on Remdesivir treatment for #COVID19 infection.
The first one is a double blind controlled multi center clinical trial on 237 patients in China
The second one 5 versus 10 days treatment in severe #COVID19 patients
Let's have a look -> thread
The first study is a double blind placebo controlled multi center clinical trial in China in 237 #COVID19 patients. We have now the published result of this trial. Please remember there was a leak on this trial a week ago
Another study on #Hydroxycloroquine efficacy in #COVID19 patients from a Brazilian team has been shared widely this evening. Unfortunately I have to comment it because well it might have some public health implication & this study is atrocious
This study is not a clinical trial but a cohort study on 721 patients, recruited by telemedicine. Incl criteria Flu symptoms, OK to be treated > 18 y/o. Probable diagnosis of #SARSCoV2 but RT-PCR or X ray not compulsory. We don't even know if those patients had #COVID19 😳 😡🤦♂️
Outcome -> hospitalisation at day 7, that's it.
721 patients unrolled. 85 not followed -> 636 left => 225 refused treatment -> control group 😳 & 412 patients Hydroxycholoquine + azithromycine (dose unknown)
All followed daily by telemedicine consultation => huge select biais