This is a two-part story (#RLR)
Each stands alone but their combination is multiplicative #Synergy #Interdependence
Today’s topic: “The sample is hemolyzed” - In vitro vs In vivo
The lab notifies you “the sample is hemolyzed.”
First step in reasoning, did the hemolysis occur in the patient (in vivo) or during collection of the specimen (in vitro “ex vivo”), eg., prolonged application of the tourniquet
In vivo hemolysis -> need to determine the cause of hemolysis (part 2 by @rabihmgeha )
In vitro hemolysis -> usually consequence of collection technique
If you are a betting person, always bet in vitro hemolysis.
When should you suspect in vivo hemolysis?
Which lab finding is specific for in vivo hemolysis?
Other clues to suggest in vivo hemolysis include reticulocytosis, positive PBS (e.g., schistocytes), indirect hyperbilirubinemia, low haptoglobin, and lactic acidosis.
Conclusion:
(1) Important to know when a “hemolyzed sample” is due to in vivo pathology
(2) Once you have established in vivo hemolysis, part 2 bit.ly/2VMkoYy will guide you