Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Interdependence
Most recents (7)
I wanted to share my opinion piece below. Please feel free to comment, add, disagree etc.
I wanted to share this with Hexicans and anyone curious about #HEX. It started with my curiosity about why a coin's “price goes up”.
I wanted to share this with Hexicans and anyone curious about #HEX. It started with my curiosity about why a coin's “price goes up”.
What factors lead to certain cryptocurrencies gaining a loyal following even before their price rises? Is it due to the coin's popularity as a meme or its potential gains and utility? Because I am a #Hexican I delve into the underlying reasons behind its #stickiness
that generates social consensus and contributes Hex’s long-term #success. In the case of Hex, I believe the following factors play a significant role. #HEX crypto has emerged as one of the most promising #cryptocurrencies in the market today.
Daily Bookmarks to GAVNet 03/03/2021
greeneracresvaluenetwork.wordpress.com/2021/03/03/dai…
greeneracresvaluenetwork.wordpress.com/2021/03/03/dai…
Fish Farming Is Feeding the Globe. What’s the Cost for Locals? | The New Yorker
newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
#farming #fisheries
newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
#farming #fisheries
1/
This is a two part story (#RLR)
Each stands alone but their combination is multiplicative #Synergy #Interdependence
Today’s topic: “The sample is hemolyzed” - In vitro vs In vivo
This is a two part story (#RLR)
Each stands alone but their combination is multiplicative #Synergy #Interdependence
Today’s topic: “The sample is hemolyzed” - In vitro vs In vivo
2/
The lab notifies you “the sample is hemolyzed.”
First step in reasoning, did the hemolysis occur in the patient (in vivo) or during collection of the specimen (in vitro “ex vivo”), eg., prolonged application of tourniquet
The lab notifies you “the sample is hemolyzed.”
First step in reasoning, did the hemolysis occur in the patient (in vivo) or during collection of the specimen (in vitro “ex vivo”), eg., prolonged application of tourniquet
3/
In vivo hemolysis -> need to determine cause of hemolysis
In vitro hemolysis -> usually consequence of collection technique
In vivo hemolysis -> need to determine cause of hemolysis
In vitro hemolysis -> usually consequence of collection technique
1/
This is a two-part story (#RLR)
Each stands alone but their combination is multiplicative #Synergy #Interdependence
Today’s topic: “The sample is hemolyzed” - In vitro vs In vivo
This is a two-part story (#RLR)
Each stands alone but their combination is multiplicative #Synergy #Interdependence
Today’s topic: “The sample is hemolyzed” - In vitro vs In vivo
2/
The lab notifies you “the sample is hemolyzed.”
First step in reasoning, did the hemolysis occur in the patient (in vivo) or during collection of the specimen (in vitro “ex vivo”), eg., prolonged application of the tourniquet
The lab notifies you “the sample is hemolyzed.”
First step in reasoning, did the hemolysis occur in the patient (in vivo) or during collection of the specimen (in vitro “ex vivo”), eg., prolonged application of the tourniquet
3/
In vivo hemolysis -> need to determine the cause of hemolysis (part 2 by @rabihmgeha )
In vitro hemolysis -> usually consequence of collection technique
In vivo hemolysis -> need to determine the cause of hemolysis (part 2 by @rabihmgeha )
In vitro hemolysis -> usually consequence of collection technique
THREAD on the stubborn persistence (tragic, good, or otherwise) of #Interdependence. 1/
Trump and his team came into power in 2017 telling us we needed to put America first, we had returned to an era of "great power" rivalry, the laws of the Hobbesian jungle were all that mattered, and international law, norms & institutions were for sissies. 2/
In this new (or return to the old) dog-eat-dog world, the United States was going to "win" because we had more power -- military, economic, and soft power -- than all other countries. (If the jungle had returned, then we were the lion (or, if a jungle, then the tiger) 3/
"Modi’s external balancing game is either shrewd and ambitious or naive and dangerous, depending on whom in Delhi you speak to."
Here's a long THREAD with annotated quotes from my recent strategic-geostrategy essay...
brookings.edu/opinions/is-mo…
Here's a long THREAD with annotated quotes from my recent strategic-geostrategy essay...
brookings.edu/opinions/is-mo…
Every few months or so, I get out of my "neighbourhood" shell and take a look at the big picture of India's foreign policy. This 5k words essay focuses on the big Delhi debate: how should India (re)align in an changing world order? I analyze a range of positions... highlights:
"The world order’s volatility has animated the eternal Indian #debate about the tactical terms of strategic diversification ...how exactly should Delhi balance these — competing/conflicting—friends, partners, and allies into a bundle that enhances India’s strategic autonomy?"
The "I can do anything except..." framing in Disability/Deaf communities is ableist.
I know that very few want to admit or discuss this but it needs challenge, intense scrutiny & deep reflection and conversation. Not necessarily here but I hope folks are having these conversations cuz this is harmful.
It runs counter to Disability Rights, Disability Justice and Disability Solidarity precepts and praxis. It allows society to continue to believe that others who are unable to do some things are inherently lacking which contributes to systemic societal marginalization.
