My Authors
Read all threads
#Smoking and #COVID19. "The % of current smokers among those ill/hospitalised/dead is SO much lower than the general population. There is no way this can be explained by bias, chance or/and underreporting", some say. "Nicotine must be protective". Let's examine this. A thread 1/
I'll use data from a huge study in the UK, where they compared the general population (17 million people) with people who died of/with #COVID19 (Pre-print here: shorturl.at/hqtH6). Data on #smoking are from GP files prior to disease, so very little missing (4%). 2/
Among the general pop with smoking data, ~18% were current smokers. Among #COVID19 dead, ~7% were current smokers. Wow, smoking must be really protective, as smokers among the dead are less than half than expected! Not quite. 3/
The authors had sex/age data. Adjusting for age & sex, current smokers were 25% MORE likely to die. This is a strong association in the exact opposite direction. I'm not saying that this 25% figure is the truth, but certainly more likely than comparing unadjusted %. 4/
Smoking data come from GP files. If we collected data directly at the hospital, % of current smokers would likely be lower because some may have recently quit (health reasons) or because nobody asked the patients (smoking info in hosp files is often missing in 'good' times). 5/
Assuming a very optimistic (during a pandemic) 10% underreporting of current smoking (which would be analysed as never smoking), we would have had ~6% current smokers. Former smokers among dead were 62%. Compare these numbers to the (in)famous French preprint. 6/
Miyara et al. (qeios.com/read/WPP19W.3) reported 6.2% current smoking and 61% former smoking among inpatients. Admittedly, smoking prevalence is higher in FRA vs. UK, but study included health prof etc, so maybe not much higher in the source population. 7/
Nevertheless, I hope this illustrates that even big differences in #smoking prevalence between patients/dead and general pop don't necessarily mean lower risk among smokers. Smokers may prove to be at lower risk, but this is definitely not the way to show this. 8/
Finally, underreporting can be a major or minor issue depending on the context. In most studies so far there didn't seem to be a checklist for the physicians to complete. If they had made a note about smoking in the file, fine. If not, hard to know what was the case. 9/
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Filippos Filippidis

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!