Protect Democracy Profile picture
May 12, 2020 3 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Roberts asks whether the number of committees should matter. Does more committees mean more harassment? What about subpoenas from state District Attorneys? If the president is just getting a subpoenaed a lot overall, should that factor into analysis of a particular subpoena?
Concerning line of q's frm Roberts. If a POTUS is suspected of criminal activity, corruption, conflict of interest, all the relevant bodies w/legal authority may be able to investigate -- & should. #NoOneIsAboveTheLaw #NobodyIsAboveTheLaw #SCOTUS
Do we want a system where POTUS w/MORE cause for concern are MORE protected from investigation? #NoOneIsAboveTheLaw #NobodyIsAboveTheLaw #SCOTUS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Protect Democracy

Protect Democracy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @protctdemocracy

Oct 30
BREAKING: Despite clear facts and law, SCOTUS overturned two carefully reasoned federal court rulings in our lawsuit challenging Virginia’s illegal voter-purge program w/o explaining their decision. Bottom line: We know this program removes eligible voters.
The facts here remain simple: Virginia is keeping eligible citizens from voting by chasing conspiracy theories to score political points — a blatant attempt to deceive the American public and undermine confidence in our safe and secure elections.
Virginia has not presented any evidence of noncitizens participating in elections. Because there is none. AND it’s actually eligible VA voters that have been caught in the middle of this election-subversion scheme.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 23
BREAKING: Federal jury finds "Trump Train" ringleader liable for committing acts of political intimidation in violation of state & federal law. This victory for our clients also reaffirms that all citizens are protected against politically motivated threats, intimidation & force.
This verdict is especially significant in today’s climate of heightened political tension. It sends a strong signal to all Americans that justice will be swift for anyone who engages in acts of political violence in this upcoming election or any election hereafter. Today’s ruling affirms the right of every individual in this country to voice their political beliefs without fear that they will be threatened or injured just for exercising their right to participate in our democracy.  [And it] sends a strong signal to all Americans that anyone who engages in acts of political intimidation or violence in this upcoming election or any other election will be held accountable.
Background reading:
1️⃣@Richard_Primus for @lawfare on the significance of the Klan Act
2️⃣Curtain-opener by @McGeeReports for @TexasTribune

3️⃣ Mid-trial reporting by @awakeinroses for @AP lawfaremedia.org/article/the-kl…
texastribune.org/2024/09/06/bid…
apnews.com/article/texas-…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 8
Today 19 retired 4-star officers & service secretaries urged #SCOTUS to reject Trump’s immunity claim, citing the disastrous impact presidential criminal immunity would wreak on the chain of command, civilian control of the military, & national security. protdem.org/NatSecAmicus4_…
The Constitution enshrines rule of law & civilian control of the military, “bedrock features of our democracy & are deeply rooted in our nation’s history,” and…[Trump’s] theory of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution is an assault on these foundational commitments.”
Retired General George Casey, one of the signatories had this to say: Members of the military take an oath to defend the Constitution, to obey the orders of the President of the United States and to adhere to the law—including the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Giving a Commander-in-Chief immunity from criminal prosecution would place the President above the law.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 18
WATCH: @AmandaCarpenter joined @FiringLineShow to explain what Trump has promised for his second term. ⬇️
Here are the six major threats that we can expect from an authoritarian president occupying the White House in 2025
(plus, threaded below for more ⬇️🧵) Image
1⃣ Pardons to license lawbreaking: As president Trump was a pioneer in pardon abuse and has promised to further abuse that power to reward violent actors and place himself above the law
Read 9 tweets
Jan 18
Trump, the likely R nominee for POTUS, has promised to enact policies threatening core democratic institutions.

In a new report, our experts analyze whether & how those promises might override the checks designed to constrain POTUS abuses of power.
authoritarianplaybook2025.org
The report, written by a cross-ideological team of experts, thoroughly compiles Trump’s stated plans and tackles the question: Is our system of checks & balances robust enough to constrain an autocrat in the White House?

It focuses on 6 threat areas 🧵⬇️ Image
1⃣ Pardons to license lawbreaking:
During Trump’s 1st term, he used pardons to induce witnesses against him into silence. In a 2nd term, he's indicated to further abuse pardons to incite political violence, incentivize lawbreaking for his benefit, & place himself above the law.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
BREAKING: The city of San Marcos and its police dept have agreed to settle our case alleging they turned a blind eye to the so-called “Trump Train” engaging in political violence against passengers on the Biden-Harris bus in lead-up to the 2020 election. protectdemocracy.org/work/san-marco…
In settling this case, the City on behalf of the police department has admitted to falling short of its policing standards and has agreed to institute mandatory training for all its officers and to compensate the victims they failed to protect.
🔗 ➡️ protdem.org/4054mJN
In filing this case, the victims claimed police violated the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871—a law that makes it illegal for law enforcement to negligently fail to take steps to prevent certain conspiracies to engage in election-related violence or intimidation. protectdemocracy.org/work/klan-act-…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(