My Authors
Read all threads
I am giving a talk on "SARS-CoV-2 testing and Immunity" this week. Thought it would make a good #Tweetorial.

Thread/
First testing.

You can categorize testing as follows:

✅Pathogen based (test for presence of virus)

✅Host based (test for patient's response)
There have been a LOT of Emergency Use Authorizations granted by the FDA. For a variety of tests.
Here are the types of tests that detect virus.

✅Molecular/Genetic (RT-PCR)
✅Antigen
✅Viral culture
Host-based test look for antibodies against virus that are produced due to your adaptive immune response.

Either IgG or IgM.
Here is a graphic that explains the difference between a RT-PCR and Antibody test.
RT-PCR tests are the most commonly available test out there currently. Typically requires a nasopharyngeal sample.
They target a variety of RNA genes.

✅envelope (env)
✅nucleocapsid (N)
✅spike (S)
✅RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)
✅ORF1 genes.
RT-PCR detects genetic material. Fragments. That's it.

How long can you you have a positive RT-PCR test?

This study reported as long as 8 days after resolution of symptoms.

nature.com/articles/s4159…
However, you know from my recent tweet that there are many people out there who have seen positive RT-PCRs for much longer periods. Beyond 50 days even.

Does this mean you are infectious that entire time?

No.

What test can determine if we have active (whole) virus?

Nothing commercially available. You have to do this in a lab via cell culture.

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…
There is a report that demonstrates active virus via cell culture cannot be isolated from the respiratory system after about 8 days.

nature.com/articles/s4158…
How about Antigen testing. Can that determine 'infectivity'?

Maybe.

Well...one company was granted an EUA last week. We are told many will soon follow.

But problem is that it may not be sensitive enough. Lots of false negatives according to this.

fda.gov/news-events/pr…
How about antibodies?

Here's a pre-print with good info on IgM and IgG.

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
As you can see. Not everyone mounts the same antibody response. Some strong. Most weak. Some not much at all.

Who's protected? And for how long?

Unknown.
That's why the WHO issued this statement.

"There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection."

who.int/news-room/comm…
This paper circulated last week on #MedTwitter.

I found it a quite useful summary.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…

End/
I should have also said that this was on 9 patients.

NINE.

So is it possible some people may be 'infectious' for a longer period? Probably.

Need more data on infected patients. With serial viral cultures.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Kevin K. Chung, MD

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!