Back to proofing “Curating *Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities,*” final section on structure & approach. Had forgotten that tho we have 59 keywords, we’ve got 84 curators — ZOWEE! We had an eye towards diversifying #digped convo bit.ly/2Lp7fzO #curateteaching
DPiH: We had repetition of 16 artifacts, but the divergent uses of the artifacts were integral to demo variance in use, e.g., from “Play” to “Fiction,” from “Archive” to “Intersectionality,” from “Curation” to “Community” bit.ly/2Lp7fzO #curateteaching
DPiH: Yep - "Identifying digital pedagogy keywords allows us to document nodes of activity and to promote dialogue across domains and between silos by creating a shared vocabulary.” bit.ly/3fSodVg #curateteaching
DPiH: But we also embrace difference w/an example that’s important right now - "Consider different understandings of the keyword “Online,” which for many in higher education implies content delivery or consumption . . .” bit.ly/3fSodVg #curateteaching
DPiH: “. . .in a stereotypical understanding of dist ed, wherein the student reads content, posts a resp to a disc board, & takes a test. Collier’s exploration, however, includes the role of community & social presence of the participants.” bit.ly/3fSodVg #curateteaching
DPiH: we asked curators to identify other keywords that are related to theirs - this is the tangled web of interactions we discovered with this exercise bit.ly/3fSodVg #curateteaching 
DPiH: we were keenly aware of what was missing from our list. S/T, we couldn’t find a curator to author; others, a curator withdrew. We’re missing “Attention,” “Graphic Novels/Comics,” “Mobile,” “Peer Review,” “Edition,” “Topic Modeling” bit.ly/3fSodVg #curateteaching
DPiH: the search function, tagging, and keyword cross referencing is clutch for full use of this project. If you search Twitter for #digped ideas, you get 41 hits: bit.ly/2Z9eIv1 #curateteaching
DPiH: momentarily sidetracked by a troll…ahem…back - working on the section about why we edited this whole thing in public on GitHub & then open peer review on MLA Commons bit.ly/3csLZ8a #curateteaching
DPiH: in addition to asking curators to write in a different style about #digped (no reflections), we had a big ask abt doing e/t in public, including open peer review bit.ly/2T0rNmb #curateteaching
DPiH: In the end, what *is* this project? a book? A collection? A Web site? Some hybrid form? How about “publication,” an act of making public the time, effort, labor, & scholarship of 100 of hum instructors related to teaching & learning bit.ly/2AnJ1Ui #curateteaching
DPiH: I’m in the conclusion now & wondering just how many will start here w/our manifesto (80pp printed!) abt #digped ? bit.ly/2AnJ1Ui #curateteaching
DPiH: we are working on the search function to ensure that it includes all works cited entries. Who doesn’t look up their own citations? So, take a look at our vast WC for this intro - it’s a good primer for who’s writing about #digped bit.ly/35RCKvK #curateteaching
@threadreaderapp unroll
