On one level it makes sense - the coronavirus is hammering fare revenues.
But that’s not all of the story. Far from it. #thread 1/12
What do I mean? 2/12
The then Mayor, one @BorisJohnson, identified £12bn of savings to start. Another £4bn would have put the service on a sustainable footing over the long haul. 3/12
This move has cost TfL £640m so far. 5/12
● TfL staff levels cut by 30%
● Crossrail being delayed to 2022 - at this point, it will have cost the GLA and TfL an extra £3.65bn
● £300m of cash reserves being spent this fiscal year 7/12
In the last four years under Khan's chairmanship of TfL:
17/25 major infrastructure projects (eg tube and station upgrades) are now delayed or cancelled
1/8 major roads are in a bad state of repair
In other words, our city runs less smoothly. 8/12
This is not going to fix the problem though. 9/12
That's the max. level of debt TfL is allowed to reach. We've hit the ceiling.
Each year, Londoners have to pay £400m in interest on that debt.
If Khan wants a bailout, he must explain how he’ll pay it back. 10/12
The failure of TfL is not because of Coronavirus. It is because of four years of bad management by Sadiq Khan.
TfL is now asking for a £3.2bn bailout.
But Khan did not fix the roof while the sun was shining.
And now Londoners will have to foot the bill.11/12
Gov support must not allow the Mayor to repeat his financial mismanagement
A bailout must be accompanied by scrutiny and oversight. @SadiqKhan is someone to whom you don't want to hand a blank cheque. 12/12