Completely missing the point(s) @JonathanTurley made. I suspect intentionally B/C you're covering for your prior reporting failures during the Russia Hoax.
Those same people under oath said there was no evidence of wrongdoing, no Russian connection. Not all those roles unmask.
Those same people under oath said there was no evidence of wrongdoing, no Russian connection. Not all those roles unmask.
There are also requests to unmask before @GenFlynn's conversation with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak was a thing.
Get it?
Do "journos" like Kyle enjoy being used and lied to from fake sources?
They're not your sources, folks. You are their asset.
There's a big difference.
Get it?
Do "journos" like Kyle enjoy being used and lied to from fake sources?
They're not your sources, folks. You are their asset.
There's a big difference.
Think the Russia Hoax clearly revealed the laziness and inexperience of many modern reporters, both political and national security.
Some are naive and easily turned into an asset. Others are just ideologically corrupt and eager to be an asset.
Either way, both are twisted up.
Some are naive and easily turned into an asset. Others are just ideologically corrupt and eager to be an asset.
Either way, both are twisted up.
