My Authors
Read all threads
Former Obama officials are defending the repeated unmasking of Flynn by arguing that his comms must have been supremely suspicious. The FBI found 'no evidence of wrongdoing' just over a week after Flynn's call with Kislyak was leaked to the press.

spectator.us/joe-biden-mich…
There was even a debate in the WaPo newsroom around the time of the leak as to whether the Kislykak calls were even newsworthy. Yet somehow the Obama administration needed to unmask Flynn 48 times bc he was just so sketchy?
If the calls were just so disturbing that over a dozen admin officials, including Biden and Obama's CoS needed to find out who was involved in them, why did the FBI need to 'get [Flynn] to lie.' These defenses make zero sense!!!!!!
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Amber Athey

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!