Thread by @AnirbanFromRLF

Let us assume that @republic & #ArnabGoswami deliberately held up undisputed & bonafide debts & the creditors committed suicide.. Even then IMO a case of Abetment to Suicide u/s 306 IPC is not borne out.. What's there to investigate or reinvestigate here?

https://twitter.com/AnilDeshmukhNCP/status/1265290195911553025?s=19

IMHO a mention in a Suicide Note per se doesn't make one liable u/s 306 IPC. Essential ingredients of offence as laid down must exist.

In a one sided love affair, person commits suicide & names the other in note. Other can't be made liable for Abetment.

https://twitter.com/AMadumool/status/1265523000197238792?s=19

As I said in first Tweet above, even if we assume that money was owed & not paid, no case for Abetment of Suicide is borne out.. U/S 306 IPC there must exist an intention to cause death by suicide & an instigation / incitement.. That's not the case here.

https://twitter.com/AMadumool/status/1265527613449256961?s=19

Right. 2 distinct concepts exist in Criminal Law. Further Investigation & Reinvestigation... Cops can do Further Investigation on their own but normally permission of Magistrate is sought u/s 173(8) CrPC. Reinvestigation can be ordered only by High Court.

https://twitter.com/vivekanandg/status/1265645707840626688?s=19

Law in your Judgment is well settled. "Conduct of Accused should leave Victim with no option but Suicide" is essential ingredient of Sec 306 IPC.. That's another ingredient missing here IMHO.. Victim had legal recourse against @republic & #ArnabGoswami .

https://twitter.com/AMadumool/status/1265659851197292545?s=19

Entirely one's prerogative to have or not have faith in Legal System... But an argument that Deceased wanted immediate settlement outside Legal System & therefore was left with no option but to commit suicide would not stand in a Court of Law. IMHO.

https://twitter.com/AMadumool/status/1265679790352347136?s=19