I made the mistake of reading this garbage; I’ll quickly break it down, in sincere hope... that it’ll save you the torture or clicking on it yourself.
There are *serious* problems in Judge Sullivan’s response... and Kyle more than matches with his 🤡-Journo spirit.
- Thread -
There are *serious* problems in Judge Sullivan’s response... and Kyle more than matches with his 🤡-Journo spirit.
- Thread -
Here’s the first direct quote from Sullivan’s filing - it’s a prime example of what I see as the Root Cause of the problems:
Does Judge Sullivan think he is a Judge, a Prosecutor, or both?
It reads as though he has assumed the obligation of both <— kindest way I can put it!!!!!
Does Judge Sullivan think he is a Judge, a Prosecutor, or both?
It reads as though he has assumed the obligation of both <— kindest way I can put it!!!!!
Color Coded For Efficiency
Yellow: Are these legal requirements?
Red: Have our courts turned into intelligence gathering services? What other (real) value might exist in in such a process?
Purple: “Prosecutor”?
Yellow: Are these legal requirements?
Red: Have our courts turned into intelligence gathering services? What other (real) value might exist in in such a process?
Purple: “Prosecutor”?
Reminder: The Prosecutors (DOJ) are saying that they no longer wish to Prosecute @GenFlynn...
Unsurprisingly, GF (and his brilliant legal team) AGREE!
In other words, THERE IS NO FUCKING CONFLICT THAT REQUIRES A JUDGE - THERE IS NO DISPUTE TO RULE ON!!
WTF?!?
Unsurprisingly, GF (and his brilliant legal team) AGREE!
In other words, THERE IS NO FUCKING CONFLICT THAT REQUIRES A JUDGE - THERE IS NO DISPUTE TO RULE ON!!
WTF?!?
This is some of the most extraordinary “Bow-tie Bull Shit” that I have ever seen...
Read this first statement again and ponder this:
What if the prosecutors just decide to do NOTHING - what then?
ie DOJ Prosecutors decide to show up for scheduled hearings, but do/say NOTHING?
Read this first statement again and ponder this:
What if the prosecutors just decide to do NOTHING - what then?
ie DOJ Prosecutors decide to show up for scheduled hearings, but do/say NOTHING?
... what, in his mind, does he imagine doing in that situation?
Imagine US Attorneys showing up (when required), politely standing when Judge enters, but remaining stone-cold silent...
Is he going to hold them in contempt for refusing to prosecute someone?
Imagine US Attorneys showing up (when required), politely standing when Judge enters, but remaining stone-cold silent...
Is he going to hold them in contempt for refusing to prosecute someone?
It sounds like an insane thought-experiment, but if he is allowed to continue on this path... DOJ Attorneys are forced into the following predicament:
👉🏻 To satisfy his requests, they’ll likely be required to prove facts (aka ‘bona fides’) that are part of ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS!
👉🏻 To satisfy his requests, they’ll likely be required to prove facts (aka ‘bona fides’) that are part of ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS!
Yes - I 💯 agree... the ‘thought-experiment’ I just laid out IS INSANE!
- BUT - If he is allowed to continue (as he argued)... what are DOJ Attorneys going to do?
This is why I asked if our courts have become “intelligence gathering” operations (See ‘Red’, below)...
- BUT - If he is allowed to continue (as he argued)... what are DOJ Attorneys going to do?
This is why I asked if our courts have become “intelligence gathering” operations (See ‘Red’, below)...
News Flash: The Mueller Musketeers made a BUNCH of false representations; DOJ DOES NOT pull u-turns like this w/o SERIOUS FUCKING PROBLEMS!!!
No need for motions unless he intends to force DOJ to PROVE that VanGrack’s representations were WRONG, showing the...
No need for motions unless he intends to force DOJ to PROVE that VanGrack’s representations were WRONG, showing the...
... evidence that is ALMOST CERTAINLY part of an investigation into Team Coup!
So I ask, again:
• What will DOJ Attorneys do?
• Would they hand evidence (from another investigation) to Judge Sullivan... when there is no longer a disagreement on legality of Flynn’s actions?
So I ask, again:
• What will DOJ Attorneys do?
• Would they hand evidence (from another investigation) to Judge Sullivan... when there is no longer a disagreement on legality of Flynn’s actions?
... it’s exactly this type of insanity that motivated me to run a poll a few weeks ago.
“Is there a viable option/conclusion... other than Military Tribunals?”
A question like that seemed insane 3 years ago; 87% thought it’s the only viable option!
“Is there a viable option/conclusion... other than Military Tribunals?”
A question like that seemed insane 3 years ago; 87% thought it’s the only viable option!
Booger Green: Agreed! Why not just ‘wash your hands’ of it?
Blue: ‘Factual Findings’ were ‘lies’
Orange Box: Contradicts ‘Booger Green’
Purple: Judge + Prosecutor; would be one HELL of an ‘intelligence gathering operation’
Pink (middle): Potential consumers/brokers of intel
Blue: ‘Factual Findings’ were ‘lies’
Orange Box: Contradicts ‘Booger Green’
Purple: Judge + Prosecutor; would be one HELL of an ‘intelligence gathering operation’
Pink (middle): Potential consumers/brokers of intel
- Hear No Evil - See No Evil -
Showing up on time, but otherwise refusing to participate - the INSANE scenario I decribed earlier - is starting to sound... ‘gentile’.
It’s already ‘short of what the parties sought - end of story!
Showing up on time, but otherwise refusing to participate - the INSANE scenario I decribed earlier - is starting to sound... ‘gentile’.
It’s already ‘short of what the parties sought - end of story!
Moving on to Kyle... to prevent brain hemorrhaging.
Is Kyle a damn Reporter, or a Repeater?
- OR -
💡: Is Kyle Judge Sullivan’s lawyer; did he author Sullivan’s response?
If not, then this is almost certainly plagerism - an irony that wouldn’t be lost on @SidneyPowell1!
Is Kyle a damn Reporter, or a Repeater?
- OR -
💡: Is Kyle Judge Sullivan’s lawyer; did he author Sullivan’s response?
If not, then this is almost certainly plagerism - an irony that wouldn’t be lost on @SidneyPowell1!
This isn’t simply a cheap shot...
It’s not unbecoming of professional standards, or basic ideals of dignity - it’s lower!
This is, perhaps, the sickest shit I have read in a long time, @kyledcheney.
Watching the 10 minute video was difficult; watching you pimp it is beyond me!
It’s not unbecoming of professional standards, or basic ideals of dignity - it’s lower!
This is, perhaps, the sickest shit I have read in a long time, @kyledcheney.
Watching the 10 minute video was difficult; watching you pimp it is beyond me!
@politico - I don’t expect you to stop pimping tragedy for the sake of our country, but unless Kyle filed on behalf of Judge Sullivan... I do expect you to address the plagerism.
Here are some other unsolicited ‘process improvements’:
1. The article references a ‘leak’...
Here are some other unsolicited ‘process improvements’:
1. The article references a ‘leak’...
... or leaks or the call between General Flynn & Kislyak (2017); why refernce the leaks when transcript is available?
2. The leaks were inaccurate; the transcript proves it.
3. Afterwards, transcript release was linked; risks chances of successfully hitting propaganda potential
2. The leaks were inaccurate; the transcript proves it.
3. Afterwards, transcript release was linked; risks chances of successfully hitting propaganda potential
4. POSITIVE NOTE: The link to the transcripts doesn’t link directly to the transcripts! A failure, this surely is not!!
Linking to 10 more paragraphs of Kyle’s bullshit (before the reader can access the actual transcripts) acts as a ‘Best In Class: Propaganda Force Multipliers’
Linking to 10 more paragraphs of Kyle’s bullshit (before the reader can access the actual transcripts) acts as a ‘Best In Class: Propaganda Force Multipliers’
5. Everyone hates the embedded source documents (that you use, see pic). Not just me - everybody!
Hard for Boomers to navigate; they suck on mobile (youngsters).
- Conversely -
Nearly assures they won’t be studied, max. potential on next 10 paragraphs of Kyle’s BS Propaganda
Hard for Boomers to navigate; they suck on mobile (youngsters).
- Conversely -
Nearly assures they won’t be studied, max. potential on next 10 paragraphs of Kyle’s BS Propaganda
In Conclusion:
• Journalistic Integrity issues are prevalent early & often
• Risks are largely mitigated with the additional ‘Kyle’, which is reinforced by frustrating user experience (trying to access source docs
• The combination of ‘Kyle’ and poor user experience...
• Journalistic Integrity issues are prevalent early & often
• Risks are largely mitigated with the additional ‘Kyle’, which is reinforced by frustrating user experience (trying to access source docs
• The combination of ‘Kyle’ and poor user experience...
... is likly seen (in your eyes, @politico) as a net-positive - net propaganda + narrative control likly outweighs user experience concerns
••• Frustrated and confused, the reader isn’t likly to realize that Kyle refrenced “sanctions” SEVEN times, Kislyak twice & Flynn ZERO!
••• Frustrated and confused, the reader isn’t likly to realize that Kyle refrenced “sanctions” SEVEN times, Kislyak twice & Flynn ZERO!
[End]
