@mikejohansenmd @NEJM @TheLancet There is more evidence of falsification with this figure. @ADAlthousePhD will provide more details in the morning on the variance estimates.
@mikejohansenmd @NEJM @TheLancet @ADAlthousePhD Now look at the reference group 0-10: the figure claims that 11-20 and 21-30 year-olds have a lower risk of death relative to kids <10. Well if that’s true it should be the headline of the @NEJM study.
@mikejohansenmd @NEJM @TheLancet @ADAlthousePhD The odds ratio for the risk of death relative to kids <10 to those over 80 should be like 200x the OR not ~5.
@mikejohansenmd @NEJM @TheLancet @ADAlthousePhD The OR is not even calculatable for this faked data because the number of kids and deaths in this sized cohort would be a handful, estimates would be unstable and the error easily detected by a college student in a stats class.
@mikejohansenmd @NEJM @TheLancet @ADAlthousePhD This figure is the smoking gun of lies that @Surgisphere created. No investigator, editor, or peer reviewer can defend it.
