1/I'd like to tell the general picture of what we've researched over Rt and epidemic development.
It explains many of the questions I'm asking about our other research, and it's always glued to the best data available.
As any thesis it's opened to improve.
There we go
It is just a useful tool to evaluate epidemic development, but it's constantly relaying in statistic approach.
There's not such thing as a brute R0, defined by God as a universal for the virus, it is always Rt.
Virus' behave depends on its Rt. Once it jumps over 1, epidemic explosion and fast grow awaits. Less than one and it is fighting back to its basal phase.
HI is like getting a little lead ball for each infected in the virus pocket, it reduces it's jump.
We've been unable to prove any significant capacity of human most famous measures, from lockdown to mask. And so told WHO
Apart from good hygienics, like washing hands, there's no evidence 4 any other. All tendencies remain nonchalant when studied
Evidence very low said WHO.
We couldn't find a trace of them.
Better strategy? Being more contagious and less lethal.
Is it so hard to believe in normal going on?!
I'm sure more to come on the issue next months.
Any further info you can have on the issue will be more than welcomed.
pnas.org/content/116/52…
On the graphs, the constant decrease tendencies of different countries, with different strategies not only between countries but in time for each country.
Where are the human measures?
Insignificant impact
who.int/influenza/publ…
ecdc.europa.eu/en/publication…
Support her!
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…