I am one of the ”EXCOs” for this group that @NdaliOzegbe just attacked, so let me provide a response on our behalf 😁
If the email has a specific call to action, then I have a responsibility to respond timely, or at least, provide a preliminary response as to when I’ll be done.
For me, once you sent an email, it should be assumed that I got it (unless it’s a spam email - to many people at the same time).
There is another category of emails that do not merit a response. I’ll give you an example.
Someone, without any previous chat with me, got my email from the web and sent me a 50-page business plan to help him review and that he needs to submit it to an investor in 24 hours 🤷🏽♂️
There are also some emails that lack purpose. There could be plenty paragraphs, but.....and so what? What is my own? Sometimes, I assume that it is informational.
This category includes unsolicited emails from marketers. They’ll send unsolicited IT related proposal to a CEO 🙄
Of course, if I see @senatorbenayade type of ‘Olympopotic’ grammar in the first paragraph, I’ll trash 🗑 the email. No response is required.
Lastly, I believe people also need to check the value of adding each mail recipient. There are so many emails that I get (as part of the “TO” list or the “Cc” list) that I actually do not have any business in such emails.
I ignore after just reading the preview only.
Yes, i know it is possible that I might be missing some important emails with my approach. However, I need to use the approach that works for my sanity. I can’t afford to read and/or respond to ~300 daily emails that I receive.
Thsnks @NdaliOzegbe for pushing me to share my unrefined perspectives. Looking forward to reading and learning from other people’s approaches. #WO
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On education, the FGN needs to grant full autonomy to the schools, issue clear KPIs (admission, teaching, research, infrastructure quality, graduates’ placement rates), and then regulate.
Let me attempt to answer @ItsChristy__ ‘s question 😁
Apparently, she went back to negotiate the termination clause.
The company had a policy that termination or resignation required 4-weeks notice with no payment-in-lieu.
She didn't like it. It limits her flexibility to switch to a new job if such an opportunity comes.
They agreed to give her a waiver because they desperately needed her.
The company now agreed to amend the clause to say that both parties could terminate the employment contract with one week notice or payment in lieu. The updated employment letter was signed.
Thanks Prof @yomitheprof for this article. While your conclusions are not aligned with my views on this topic, I believe that most of the arguments are logical and fair.
I believe that some of the issues raised should drive the discussion for the first amendment to #CAMA2020 😁
Yomi’s article is actually the best non pro-CAMA article that I have seen - it came with strong logic that is devoid of unnecessary emotions and sentiments.
Let me just share my thoughts on some of the issues raised.