Here's a thing about if you're worried that some of Trump's supporters will start a civil war if he loses?
Personally, I think they're more likely to do it if he wins.
Because what they want isn't a peaceful victory. They want the war. They want to shoot their "enemies".
If the deplorables who put Trump in office get everything they want without further bloodshed, without firing another shot... they didn't get everything they want because they wanted was more bloodshed and more shots. Those are like the main thing.
Look at that story out of Forks or that neighborhood where the people lined up alongside their actual white fence with guns to "make the rioters behave" and all the people's social media posts where they salivate, masturbate, at the idea of shooting looters at their house.
This is *without* getting into the "boogaloo boys" whose fondness for Trump or allegiance white supremacy have both been overstated and understated in my opinion but that's neither here nor there because it's without getting into them.
I am not omniscient, the world is huge and information is a million firehouses, but... I have not seen any stories about houses being burned down or any home invasions definitely connected to "the unrest". No one I've asked has seen any, either, including people afraid of it.
I say "afraid of it", but, actually, I haven't seen anybody in fear of it, either. What I've seen is people who Refuse To Be Afraid Because They've Got Guns And When Those Rioters Come They'll Learn To Stay In Their Own Neighborhoods.
There are people out there who, unlike "the boogs", would not tell you that they want a civil war. They probably don't think they do. But they've been fantasizing about it, planning for it, getting excited thinking about how they can combine murder with being a patriotic good guy
Like Trump, though, most of them are ultimately dangerous cowards. That's why they hid in their homes, thank goodness, fantasizing about someone forcing their hand, backing them into a corner where they'd have to shoot.
Like Trump, the more invincible they feel, the more dangerous they'll become. Remember after Trump's election how there was a spate of violent confrontations by people saying, "Trump's president, I don't have to [whatever] anymore." and "Trump said I could." and such?
If he wins again, both he and his worst followers are going to take it as a sign that they're in the clear. God and the country on their side, and nothing to lose because he can't lose an election any more... he either serves his term or he stays forever.
Do I worry about what Trump and his followers will do if he loses? Sure. But that's a problem for when/if it happens.
I am far, far more worried about what they will do if he wins. Far more worried.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Along the lines of the sentiment in this tweet: one thing about the Critical Role cartoon is it illustrates how much more interesting magic tends to be in the stories that inspired or were inspired by D&D than in actual D&D.
Like, a lot of the magic use in Legend of Vox Machina has a direct line of inspiration from spells that exist in the D&D rules, and a general trope of being able to exhaust one's magic if overused correlates in a vague way with the game's expendable spell slots.
But the magic does not behave like D&D magic, even D&D magic with an inventive player and generously flexible DM. Because D&D's magic obeys rules designed with specific gameplay purposes in mind, and LoVM's magic obeys rules designed with storytelling purposes in mind.
A thing about "D&D is mainly good for combat, you can tell because of what it has rules for" is that if you released an indie game that had all the non-combat parts of D&D it would be more rules-heavy than a lot of non-combat indie games are.
Anyway, D&D rules aren't 90% combat. They're 90% character options. The PHB is about 300 pages and about 30 of those pages deal with rules for gameplay. The rest are "Here is a thing your character might do/be."
And by and large, the reason I'm into D&D and the reason I like to get new people into D&D is that I vibe with "Here are a bunch of modular, prefab character options you can snap together like interlocking plastic building blocks" more than more abstract character creation stuff.
Literally eating berries and cream like a little lad for breakfast today.
We're paring down frozen stuff from the freezer for a much-needed defrost and there were some ancient frozen mixed berries in there.
I started making panna cotta as my new pandemic skill and I had planned on topping some with jam for a Valentine's dessert...
...but panna cotta isn't terribly firm and the likely difficulty of spreading jam across the top of the custard without just wrecking it had me thinking about other alternatives, and I remembered we had frozen berries from Whenever in the deep freeze.
The Ted Talk in the second episode of Inventing Anna is such a perfect parody of a Ted Talk because it sounds exactly like a real Ted Talk. In this tweet, I will
My version of "don't watch dinosaur movies with paleontologists" is "don't watch movies with scenes taking place in Omaha malls or cultural attractions".
I don't know where those zoo exteriors were shot for the Berkshire Hathaway party scene, but I know where it wasn't shot.
As a general rule, I think big-city people who watch a movie and go, "Shyeah, they expect us to believe she took the chartreuse line at KT-tirst street and somehow got off across town at the Spromg Street station in time to catch the zeppelin? As if." are insufferable.
A thing about NFTs is that whenever someone says they can be used to purchase something (event tickets, digital music, in-game assets) in a form that allows the purchaser to re-sell them... the reason you can't do those things already is a policy choice, not a technical limit.
Any company that is willing to use NFTs to sell you things that you own in a way that is transferable could have done so without NFTs.
What NFTs actually add on a technical level isn't the ability to be sold, but the ability to be stolen.
Whatever digital good the NFT represents is still stored in a central location. Access to the digital good is still mediated by a single central authority. But their willingness to equate ownership with a cryptographic token that exists outside their control makes it stealable.