My Authors
Read all threads
What is wrong with #DraftEIA2020 ? (A point-wise thread).
This March the Government proposed a new EIA notification, which would supersede the EIA notification of 2006.
An EIA process firstly exists to protect the environment from industries which would irreparably harm it.
However, the proposed draft EIA 2020 is being called by experts as a 'compilation of violations'.
It dilutes several existing rules and safeguards.
It lays a foundation favourable to industries, injurious to wildlife and public health.
How exactly? Here are some salient points.
1. Post-facto approvals -

The draft has favourable provisions for projects which have been started illegally in protected areas, without permission or without following due process.

They could be appraised, approved later and allowed to continue.
2. Compliance reports submitted by industries -
This has been changed from once in 6 months to once a year.

This means, if there are accidents like gas-leaks, fires, etc within this time, they may not get the attention they require and may go under-reported/not reported.
3. Destabilizing the Public hearing process -
In a democratic system, rules exist to include local people in the decision making.
The new draft exempts numerous harmful projects from public consultation.
For projects without this exemption, its power has been greatly weakened.
4. 'Strategic Projects' -

If the government considers a project as 'strategic' - which includes, but is not limited to, defence and security - then no information about it will be placed in the public domain.
5. Making Clearances faster -

This includes 'digitizing clearance processes' which gives plenty of space for ignoring guidelines and lack of due diligence.

(Just recently the NBWL apprased 31 project proposals in various protected areas over 'zoom', spending 10 mins for each.)
6. Narrow definition of Eco-sensitive areas -
The draft considers eco-sensitive areas as only those notified by the Moefcc.
This excludes places like reserve forests, sacred groves, wetlands, coasts, flood plains etc.
These have reduced protection against destructive projects.
7. Restricted functioning of scientists/experts -

Some clauses allow industries to begin 'scoping' without going through an expert appraisal committee.
Also - only recognized organizations will be consulted for EIA. This leaves out individuals who maybe experts in that field.
8. Botched data collection process -

The draft requires that data from a project site needs to be collected during one season only. It also allows use of old baseline data.

This gives much space for data-biasing and for studies to be conducted in the project's favor.
9. Some projects dont require an EIA clearance at all -

These include ropeways, waterways, irrigation projects etc , even though they may have detrimental consequences on wildlife and local people.
10. The new EIA draft significantly weakens the power of the National Green Tribunal to intervene on destructive projects.
The NGT so far has been an important body across the country in holding environmental offenders accountable. #WithdrawEIA2020 #EIAForGreenIndia #EIA2020
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Fridays For Future, Guwahati

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!