Starting it off with Zā’irjahs: an Arab divination system popular in the medieval period. This is a good paper documenting them: alpha60.de/research/scram…
Zā’irjahs are said to influence the work of the medieval monk Llull in creating his Ars Magna which has the idea of truth tables implicit in their combinatorics. He also did some pioneering work in visualizing conceptual trees.
Llull’s work would influence a key figure in the history of science: Gottfried Leibniz. In his dissertation on combinatorics, De Arte Combinatoria, influenced by Descartes’ idea and Llull’s rotating wheels, he proposes an alphabet of human thought: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Arte_C…
Leibniz devised the dx [1] and ∫ [2] notation popularly used in calculus today in his private manuscripts. The first published papers with these notations were in Acta Eruditorum in 1684 and 1686 respectively.
What is perhaps less known is that Leibniz worked on binary arithmetic. To make computation tractable in his work on combinatorics, he turned to I Ching for inspiration. He used 0s and 1s to denote what stood for chaos and order in I Ching.
There is a correction to be made in the previous tweet. Leibniz arrived at binary system independently and mapped his numerical system of unity and nothingness to the broken and unbroken lines of I Ching after Jesuit missionary Bouvet would send him a copy of the I Ching.
Found out the purportedly first ever usage of integral sign in Leibniz’s manuscripts!
TIL about rebuses: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebus which can be thought of as a precursor to emojis from the middle ages.
Together with developing a universal logic language, Leibniz was also keenly interested in engineering a “calculus ratiocinator”. Here are the sketches he made for an arithmetic reckoner in 1685. From his manuscript LH XLII, 5: digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=000…
Leibniz valued his binary arithmetic with 0s and 1s highly. Along with aiding in his calculus ratiocinator project, it had biblical undertones of “creation of everything from nothing by the One” for him. He proposed to reify it on a medallion to Duke Rudolph August in 1697:
Florian Cajori’s paper Leibniz, the Master-Builder of Mathematical Notations is a good short read to understand the attention paid by Leibniz to notation. It meticulously details in 10+ pages the broad range of notations devised by Leibniz! journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10…
Pretty neat page on Wikipedia here that shows mathematical symbols alongside their inventor and introduction date: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_…
“Periods in the Use of Euler-Type Diagrams” by Jens Lemanski is a nice paper to read to get a broad perspective on the evolution of Euler/Venn style logic diagrams between 16th and 19th century: researchgate.net/publication/31…
What was curious in this paper was the diagrams employed by Kant in his logical work. They look quite intriguing!
Lemanski follows this paper up with a detailed look on the Weigel/Weise circles that carried forth the development of these diagrams: researchgate.net/publication/31…
Another notable idea in Lemanski’s work is this Hasse diagram-style: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasse_dia… visualization of influences. It feels like a good way to visualize who influenced who when chronicling intellectual lineages.
Wilhelm Risse in his book Die Logik der Neuzeit cites that Llull’s work as inspired from a Jewish mystic Abraham Abulafia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_A…
Catalog of Programming Languages for the Enthusiast: Starting a curation on some of the cool indie / lesser known programming language projects I have been stumbling on.
Starting off with Pikelet by @brendanzab. It is a continuous source of inspiration to see Brendan starting from game dev and getting into deep type theory stuff! Check out his language Pikelet: github.com/pikelet-lang/p… and his twitter stream for updates on his work.
I encountered Koka when researching about algebraic effects. Papers from Daan Leijen on its semantics and technical details are available here: microsoft.com/en-us/research…
Design ∩ Code Systems: Curating a thread on a topic I’m really interested in. Tools that blur the line between designing and engineering. Hope you find something inspiring here: patternatlas.com/v0/models-of-i…
Starting this series with Baku’s GLisp editor — A Lisp-based design tool that bridges graphic design and computational arts. It is a polished product that shows the power of having linguistic abstractions juxtaposed with an interactive design space: glisp.app
It is bloody awesome to see him use this tool to build programming visualization environments. This is the 🔥 energy:
Starting a thread on my process for creating a timeline visualizer. I am building this for visualizing and sharing my understanding of the history of Lambda Calculus.
Here’s some prior work I have done that gives an idea of what I am trying to achieve. It shows a subset of ideas, events, and collaborations among pioneers that influenced the course of logic. History is replete with such multi-actor conversations:
I am doing this to complement my Lambda Calculus project and the results of these explorations will be available here shortly: prabros.com/lambda-calculu…
Here’s a metathread that catalogues the topics I have been exploring for the past few years.
Volume 1:
1/ What is Life? 2/ Lambda Calculus 3/ Linguistics 4/ Computational Trinitarianism 5/ Chaos and Fractals 6/ Differentiable Computing 7/ Higher Dimensions
1/ What is Life?
Inspired by the dichotomy of “gear like” vs. “life like” in engineering proposed by Alan Kay, I started looking into biology to understand it deeply. In this thread I visualize “What is Life?” by Erwin Schrödinger as I read through it:
In my pursuit for developing a graphic design tool, I realized the need for a Turing complete set of primitives for building designs bottom up. This lead me to Lambda Calculus, a formal system to explore the Turing Universe:
This is one of the most important talks I have come across recently. It critiques the discrete alphabet oriented encoding which Longo locates as the LaPlacian computational paradigm for its determinism as being the reason behind many artificial bounds imposed on human inquiry.
Yet to arrive at a tractable way of expression for this in my programming work. But computation can be expressed as a traversal on a topological space. Here’s Longo’s paper that talks about topologies for computation: di.ens.fr/users/longo/fi…
Finally a step closer towards this direction. The paper “Topological Interpretation of Interactive Computation” by Emanuela Merelli and Anita Wasilewska shows how a loop we describe with symbols when programming becomes an actual loop in space! arxiv.org/abs/1908.04264
A few weeks back, I stumbled on this memoir by Alfred Kempe on the theory of mathematical form published in 1886. Here’s a tweetstorm as I read the paper.
Alfred Kempe was the student of Arthur Cayley. In this philosophical work, he tries to unify geometrical form with logic. It would later influence Royce, Peirce, and a slew of mathematicians in their work on logic. It is available here: royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…
The scope of this memoir is to distinguish the necessary matter of exact thought from its accidental garbs. Kempe believes that algebraical, geometrical, logical, and other kinds of thinking share a unified connected form.