I'm seeing really meaningful conversations about the interdependence of #facultysuccess and #studentsucces rise up out of the HyFlex discussion, and that's always a good thing, I think.
I've written a lot about my concerns with #HyFlex as it pertains to #facultysuccess. I don't think it should be on the table for most institutions this fall.
That said, if I'm coming at this from the #studentsuccess lens, I'm intrigued. I think of students with chronic illness, for example, who might feel up to f2f class one week but not the next. Or students whose job schedules change. The flexibility does appeal to me.
But are institutions willing to invest in what it takes to do it right? I'd say you need to first give faculty a course release to shadow a more advanced HyFlex teacher, and then give them a big course reduction and treat their first HyFlex as equiv. to three courses.
And last, today I'm thinking that #HyFlex discounts the intentional pedagogy required of a quality synchronous session. There's a difference b/t just watching what's going on in the physical classroom and actually engaging in a sync session.
TLDR: ADHD is a life-threatening condition. Systems, routines, and structures keep me alive. Ignorant critiques of these strategies are ableist. Let's do better. Happy Monday!
Faculty, staff, and students should not be left in the wind like this to wonder why this is happening. It’s infuriating tbh, and #HigherEd continues to be its own worst enemy.
We have to prioritize well-being and talk about trauma.
Okay here goes nothing. A new thread 🧵about #CourseHero.
My name's Karen, I've worked in #HigherEd for 20 years, and this is the absolute last thing I want to talk about today. But, I'm compelled in the face of what I see as immense harm being done to students.
I want to be as transparent as possible and encourage you to take nothing I say at face value. Don't trust me. Trust what you see.
To that end, here's how I've profited thus far from talking about Course Hero, for any who might wonder about my motivations. $1.19.
I don't disagree with anything in this piece. What I find really interesting is the assumption that those of us who are advocating for caring pedagogy, grounded in a balance b/t support and challenge, have at any point become less rigorous.
And that to me is the mark of #ToxicRigor. When someone points to flexibility, humanizing, and support and says, "You're dumbing things down" or "You've sacrificed rigor," there's just no evidence of that, so something else is up.