Brenda Yang Profile picture
Jun 19, 2020 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Our students come to us with deep, damaging beliefs about intelligence & IQ.

I *really* wanted to teach students about intelligence last fall, but I found myself unprepared. After DAYS learning, I was angry & tired & I dumped everything into the best lesson I could manage then. Image
These materials are woefully short of perfect. I think that executed wrong, they could be damaging, so I've put off sharing them.

But as educators, we need to ask ourselves:

Are we empowering students to fight scientific racism wherever they see it, including their own minds? Image
I looked at many cog textbooks. They skirted the hard questions completely.

People I love & respect recommended Ritchie's short book. Here is the page on Galton, a full-blown OG scientific racist who COINED THE TERM EUGENICS, which is positively FAWNING ("a true genius"). 😡 ImageImage
For one take on Galton's absolute shittiness, check out this PBS column: pbs.org/newshour/natio…

"We come today not to praise Francis Galton but to bury him along with his faulty and dangerous pseudoscience of eugenics."
So the primary text for my lesson ended up being @Radiolab's extraordinary 6-part series on intelligence, "G".

I loved that it went past the simplistic "some parts are GOOD, some are BAD 🙃" to face the complexity & power of intelligence testing head on.

wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radio…
Students listened to a "G" episode before the 1st lesson, with an "entrance ticket" due that day.

Students' reflections let me peek into their headspace before starting, and the ep provided rich common ground for discussion.

Another episode was assigned as further "reading." Image
Some slides try to de-mystify IQ testing at a high level.
For example, we tried this matrix reasoning task. It's tricky.

There's an intuition that it's capturing SOME signal about cognition. And that it makes sense how this bundle of tasks would correlate with meaningful DVs. ImageImage
But it's also clear how RIDICULOUS it would be to pare down a HUMAN BEING'S worth to how well they do on the equivalent of Psychology Party Mini-Games.

Questions around measurement, operationalization, validity -- they abound.
The part I was SUPER scared to tackle in class came out of students reflecting, "HOW IS THIS STILL HAPPENING?!"

There is racism baked FUNDAMENTALLY into the cognitive sciences. We can't ignore it.

But I worry that the way I presented it just wasn't right or could re-traumatize. ImageImage
So, here are slides & teaching resources from cognitive psych lessons on intelligence.

day 1: osf.io/xde6h
day 2: osf.io/az8ec

I hope someone uses this as a starting place. We have a lot of work to do. ✊ #BlackLivesMatter #Academics4BlackLives
Epilogue

One day I'll put more of my course resources up: osf.io/z5uva

Thank you for @CharAtDuke ♥️ for rooting out my typos.

There's so much context about a course I can't fit into tweets. DM me for a thought partner.

Wash your hands. Dismantle white supremacy. 👋
Link swap! You can find the slides under "Lessons" here now:

osf.io/z5uva

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brenda Yang

Brenda Yang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @brendawyang

Aug 18, 2019
Mornin'! So I've been moonlighting as a UX intern with @DukeLibraries for a while, with a focus on web writing for the last year.

Here's my contribution to #AcademicTwitter during syllabus season: insights from user-centered content strategy to syllabus-creation

1/
Good syllabi let people grab and go.

If it's easy to find the right information, then a syllabus can actually be quite lengthy, yet still user-friendly.

If students wanted to figure out the late work policy, could they do it without (re-)reading the whole document?

2/
If information in the syllabus isn't findable, the blame for that oft-grumbled professorial mantra of 'IT'S IN THE SYLLABUS' is on the writer, not the user, in my very humble opinion.

As a baseline: clear headers, plenty of negative space, & clear prose can do a lot

3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(