Yogi Jaeger 💙 @yoginho@spore.social Profile picture
Jun 26, 2020 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
This is the complete #BeyondNetworks playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=….

We had our last discussion with the Uni Vienna MSc students today.

A little reflection… 👇🏻 /1
It’s been an incredible journey. Very wide-ranging, but also very compressed & intense. Deadlines are the only thing that forces me to overcome eternal procrastination due to excessive perfectionism. I’m still a bit dizzy (and exhausted) from the experience. /2
The product is far from perfect. I consider it like a demo tape. Something you produce before you sign up with a label to record a more professionally produced album. It’s raw in many spots. But I think the story it attempts to tell is shining through clearly enough. /3
It is a call to scientists (especially biologists) to reflect on what we are actually doing & what the big questions in our field currently are. I think that it is a shame we have forgotten about many of them lately. Biology is at heart about life itself, about living beings. /4
Peter Medawar famously remarked that “science is the art of the soluble.” Many central questions in biology are not quite soluble yet. But if we forget about them, we lose context. We start to forget just how little we know. We fall for the illusion that we understand nature. /5
I strongly believe that a lecture like this, reminding us of the things we *don’t* know, grounding our thinking in philosophical principles, should be part of any science curriculum at the undergraduate & graduate level. /6
Unfortunately, very few scientists today learn about philosophy. Few are encouraged to reflect on what they are doing. Instead we rush to produce, to publish, to go for the low-hanging fruit. We are trained to become very high-level technicians. /7
I hope, most of all, that this series of lectures encourages people to think more, reflect more, to take their time, to long after wisdom, not just facts. The academic system we have built is killing this. We need a better system. /8
Contemporary academia has trapped itself in a monoculture with a very low diversity in perspectives. We life in a time where the future is more unpredictable than ever. We need more diversity, not less. You never know, which perspectives will be useful in the future. /9
My lecture is a call for you to explore! This is what basic science should be all about. As René Thom put it: “At a time where so many scholars are calculating, is it not desirable that some, who can, dream?”

You can! And ou don’t need a Fields Medal for it. /10
I would like to thank all those who have followed me on this journey. I hope it inspired you.

I would like to thank all those who have provided feedback. It means a lot to me.

I am more determined to go on with my journey. It’s been a struggle, but it’s never dull. /11
We need to find our purpose back in academic research. We need to tackle the big questions with courage & abandon. We need to escape the constraints of the system. You can’t do this alone. But we can do it together.

So, stay in touch. Let’s discuss. And let’s move forward! /12
One day, I'll turn #BeyondNetworks into a book & will popularise its contents, because we should have this discussion across society.

In the meantime, it will remain available here. Pls share it & the ideas expressed in it!

Enjoy the ride! I hope to see you along the way. /13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yogi Jaeger 💙 @yoginho@spore.social

Yogi Jaeger 💙 @yoginho@spore.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yoginho

Jan 22
I traveled to Paris to give my philosophy crash course for scientists () to a wonderful group of @lpiparis_ @FIREPhD students, as I do every year.

Contact me if you want to bring this course to your own institute! It's not only fun, but also useful...johannesjaeger.eu/philosophy.html
... allowing you to become a better researcher through philosophy. The course has an interactive, discussion-based format that is based on an online series of lecture which are freely available: .
It helps you reflect on your own scientific practice and world view using a (1) process-based, (2) perspectival-realist, and (3) deliberative approach to the philosophy of science. The course heavily focuses on students' own experiences, practices, and questions.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 10, 2023
New blog post just dropped!

"Assembly theory is cool... but doesn't quite do what its inventors say it does."



reviewing this recent Nature paper:



TL:DR: potentially interesting model, wrapped in utterly misleading packaging.johannesjaeger.eu/blog/assembly-…
nature.com/articles/s4158…
"I think assembly theory has lots of merit and potential, but this particular paper frames its argument in a way which is unfortunate and, frankly, more than just a bit misleading. My personal suspicion is that this has two reasons: (1) the authors hyped up their claims ...
... to get the paper published in a glam journal, plus (2) they also overestimate the reach and power of their model in ways which may be detrimental to its proper application and interpretation."
Read 6 tweets
Sep 9, 2023
Just received my expected rejection from @elife (after appeal).

The way I was rejected reflects the atrocious attitude of the journal & the whole field of biology towards conceptual work.

It also showcases a lack of intellectual integrity on behalf of the journal editors. 🧵
I submitted the paper knowing full well that @eLife usually restricts its scope to empirical work. The idea was to challenge that restriction, since (in my opinion) biology urgently needs a revival of serious conceptual efforts to prevent the descent of the field into pointless..
@eLife ... construction of large data sets that are increasingly costly to produce but yield diminishing returns in terms of insight and understanding into the workings and organization of living systems. Hence, no surprise when my work was deemed "out of scope." That's fair enough.
Read 21 tweets
Jan 19, 2022
The current #COVID19 media coverage around me seems to agree on three things: (1) there is nothing we can do against #omicron, (2) this variant is mild & the wave will be over soon, (3) we're soon going "endemic," to "live with the virus," & back to normality. /1
There seems to be very little push-back against this narrative, which is something that really surprises me. But worse than that: it does *not* bode well for the next pandemic (whether the next #COVID19 variant or something altogether more worrisome). /2
Re (1): we can't do anything & #ZeroCovid was never an option.

Well, we never really tried. Those few countries that did were isolated (either geographically or surrounded by countries who didn't implement any low-incidence measures). /3
Read 23 tweets
Feb 19, 2021
Our second paper on dynamical modularity, "Dynamical Modules in Metabolism, Cell and Developmental Biology" by @NickMonk14 & myself is now available as a preprint: osf.io/rydbn via @OSFramework /1
It complements our earlier evolutionary perspective on the subject (osf.io/vfz4t) with its more regulation-based approach and a long list of practical examples that illustrate our novel conceptual framework for the dynamical decomposition of complex systems. /2
Just like our earlier paper, the argument starts with the following observation: modular phenotypic traits imply that the underlying regulatory processes—the epigenotype of the organism—must be dissociable as well. How to decompose them, however, is not a trivial task. /3
Read 16 tweets
Dec 13, 2020
Darwinian Gaia: the persister perspective on evolution. aeon.co/essays/the-gai… via @aeonmag
@aeonmag I think this an amazingly refreshing and interesting new view on evolution. For several reasons. What’s even more amazing is that one of the best evolutionary biologists today has completely transformed his view of evolution in light of new evidence. How rarely does this happen?
@aeonmag I have huge respect for W. Ford Doolittle to come forth with this revolutionary change of mind. So much of our field is mired in dogmatic talking past each other. This new approach is a much needed fresh breath of air!
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(