13,400 employees of a mismanaged federal agency are losing their paychecks at the worst possible time--a scandal by any definition, but even worse when you factor in the many thousands of immigrants with pending citizenship applications who now may not be able to vote in November
USCIS has always been 95%+ funded by the extremely expensive filing fees paid by immigrants themselves. This is why it never closes even during government shutdowns, and why it hasn't depended on Congressional appropriations generally.
So how did this happen? A few things:
DHS claims that new filings have been way down since the #COVID19 lockdowns began. And I'm sure that's true: A typical greencard through marriage costs $1760 in filing fees alone--a lot for any family facing economic uncertainty.
But there's a lot more going on here.
First, Trump's decision to cancel both Temporary Protected Status (#TPS) for most countries and #DACA for all new recipients in 9/2017 caused an immediate hit to the budget when hundreds of thousands of applicants (and their filing fees) were simply cut out
USCIS has also taken on an openly enforcement-first approach under Trump, to the point that it was actively *trying to give its own desperately-needed money to ICE* to hire 300 more officers. (This summary courtesy of @AILANational)
As @RachelMorris masterfully summarizes in this piece below--vital for understanding the current crisis--USCIS under Trump has built an "invisible wall" which has made everything much harder for everyone... including themselves. Inefficiency by design.
Just some of the bricks in this "invisible wall" which I can confirm as a practitioner:
-pointless & burdensome requests for evidence
-absurd, time-consuming denials rooted in no apparent reality with which I'm familiar
-ending "premium processing" for many work visas
USCIS has also been spending far more than ever on resource-intensive fraud investigations. This is a natural function of their Trump-era mission shift from customer service to "safeguarding integrity"--e.g., treating all applicants like liars/terrorists
The $1.2 BILLION that this once proudly-self-sufficient libertarian dream of an agency is coming to Congress for is also a result of some abysmally poor planning under illegally-appointed former director Ken Cuccinelli's leadership.
Ken Cuccinelli spent most of his time as USCIS director radically politicizing the agency, & the rest of it going on TV to talk about what sister agencies were up to in what amounted to one long (and unsuccessfuly) audition for head of DHS.
It's the politicization I blame more than anything for this. USCIS was intended to serve as a self-powered technocracy, flying under the radar even as other agencies were battered by political winds.
Under Obama USCIS chief Cissna, it mostly was. Never perfect, but always good.
If only there had been a brilliant, witty, and maybe even unexpectedly handsome prophet to warn us of this coming doom. If only
Politicization of national immigration services--not the laws and policies, which will always be political by definition, but the SERVICES THEMSELVES--is not something which healthy democracies allow, and for good reason. It's just too important.
But here we are.
Immigration agencies literally create voters. Effectively suspending nearly all naturalization applications when they would have otherwise been processed and new citizens sworn in well ahead of the November election is... well, it's not great is it?
There's a parallel here to what Rs did to the US Postal Service by forcing a vital & self-funded public utility into the red. It was originally to force privatization, but at a time when mail-in ballots will decide the election is now far more sinister
USCIS processes and adjudicates, among other things:
-asylum
-citizenship
-employment visas
-family (often incorrectly called "chain migration") visas
All of these things are not only not Trump priorities, but the OPPOSITE of Trump priorities. It's just kind of right there.
Trump and his postmodern Know Nothings have been constantly repeating the same line for years now: "We love immigrants, so long as they do it LEGALLY."
Not a single word of that has ever been true, and if you didn't already know that you sure do now.
Quick footnote since I mentioned them: the Know Nothings were in many ways the closest thing to Trump before Trump--although they were in many ways far more progressive and arguably less racist, despite literally being founded on and fueled by open racism
CORRECTION: Francis Cissna was appointed by Trump, I thought he'd carried over for some reason, but scratch the reference to him in this tweet and just leave it as a commentary on Obama's USCIS
A second footnote: I'd meant to mention before that the harsh, complex, and burdensome new #StephenMiller#publiccharge rule (which went into effect about a month before lockdowns) also no doubt drastically reduced applicants and their fees as well
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The especially frustrating thing about the right-wing opposition to #KeepingFamiliesTogether is that I sincerely believe that even most MAGAs would be fine with it if they only understood what it actually is and why it is necessary.
2/ "If only they knew" is not something I would usually say. I am of the opinion that you can't fact-check bigotry, but even a lot of bigots could be persuaded on this one because it is
(1) definitely legal and (2) addressing a very real (but little understood) problem
3/ Immigration through marriage to a US citizen is, famously, one of the easiest ways in. So long as you originally came on a visa (typically as a tourist) you can live/work in the US unlawfully for decades and still have a fairly easy path to residency through your spouse.
Me, a very clever human: write a @alyankovic parody in the form of a 15th century madrigal about the collapse of FTX and the crypto market
*two seconds later*
#OpenAI: alas tis a lamentable day, the visions of riches have become mere wishes, etc
A notably less weird Al here but otherwise am I the only one who thinks this is all kind of terrifying
I will not print it here but it cheerfully spit out an '80s party rap anthem denying the death of six million Jews in the Holocaust just because I asked it to.
The word "orgy" was consistently censored out of my prompts though so I guess we're looking out for what really matters
N. B.: the author of this fascist manifesto is not some Roman statue "Western chauvinist" account with 76 followers. He is the senior editor of the closest thing the American right has to a journal of record.
"save the country"
"rebuild and in a sense re-found"
"getting used to the idea of wielding power, not despising it"
"compromise with the left is impossible"
when I say this is fascism I mean this literally, it is literal fascism
Very few people outside the system know this, but you need to:
US asylum law knowingly & intentionally requires the deportation to certain death of people who have been on the wrong side of the criminal legal system.
First: I didn't know her, but this is the only publicly available news re: the murder of Melissa Nunez--and more importantly, her life. She was, among other things, a determined advocate who loved horses and traveling and dreamed of living in Puerto Rico
From information available online, I gather she was convicted on charges brought from defending herself against anti-trans violence. This conviction constituted an "aggravated felony," a class of offenses which bar someone from receiving asylum.
This @ similar questions from the @MarshallProj sheriffs survey linked below get to one of the most fundamental problems holding back progress today: a belief that past (white) immigrants had it harder & had to do more to "earn" a place than today's. It's exactly backward
It's only human to want to believe that your ancestors were better and smarter and worked harder than today's immigrants, because that kind of generational progress is such a fundamental part of the golden era American immigrant story. Which is to say the *white* immigrant story
But the reality is that it was hardly any trouble at all to immigrate before 1965--& absolutely no effort before 1921--& the system had nothing at all to do with today's. We are in NO WAY doing anything to make it easier now, only much much harder