I regret that I had too many notes and this resulted in two number typos.
🦠But nothing diverts from the huge black hole they reveal.
46,818 Pillar 1 tests processed 163 +ve
53,577 Pillar 2 processed ..461 +ve
83,058 Pillar 2 sent out
💥 If none UNCLEAR then 0.35% of pillar 1 (hospital, healthcare settings & clinical need) were +ve
💥0.86% of Pillar 2 tests are positive (community essential workers, care homes - mostly)
So nearly 2.5 times Pillar 1.
This is where flare ups are seen
We need to know unclears as it affects the % of +ve and indicates performance measures.
Also these may give indicators of where weaknesses are in the systems and the tests.
💥No data here
Most of your positives may cluster in a few places
That sort of data is not contained in THIS report but Leicester/Manchester/ Liverpool have demonstrated its importance.
Hunting down the data is problematic
💥 How many?
💥What actions taken because people are out there needing tests and not getting them.
💥How quickly is this actioned and by whom?
💥Just a handful? Thousands?
But is that true or did the companies involve do something to make those tests useless?
Plenty accounts of kits being returned but voided due to barcode, tube and swab issues
Care home recently being sent far more kits than requested but told not to use the balance.
But the language is a clear effort to make it look that the fault lies with the applicant and to cover up gross errors in administration.
The notes suggest that Pillar 1 are only counted when processed in the lab. We need absolute clarity whether ANY and how many of the 2.4 mill are Pillar 1. My working hypothesis is only a small number because of this.
🔥🔥🔥That still leaves over 2 million unprocessed. And it seems probable that these are substantially Pillar 2 tests
Maybe there is a bit of a time lag?
But Hancock Baby claimed hardly ANY
In fact it is rather massive.
As @TimHarford from the excellent #MoreOrLess pointed out.
It is key to understanding positivity rate.
🦠The risk of untested people passing the virus on. Remember back in March/ April about 1 in 3 people were coming back positive. Then 1 in 10. As testing expanded the positivity rate went down
🦠. What about those fabulous targets?
💥What about the decision to commission in this way? Especially as they are intending to spen more £billions
💥What was in those contracts about notification (to whom?) of non returns? Voided kits? Unclears? Reasons? IT systems? QA?
🦠Timescales
🦠Who takes what swift actions to sweep up the patients who have fallen down that black hole?
💰 who makes sure dud kits and process are dedexuted from payments? How is payment structured? How is success measured?
The Science & Technology, Health and Treasury Select Committes and the @NAOorguk @UKStatsAuth need to be on this now
And we all need HONEST answers. Trust has been battered.