A: China-UK relations have to be based on principles governing international relations: That is mutual respect for sovereignty&territorial integrity, non-interference in each other's internal affairs.
A: It is common practice. According to UK national security laws, those who committed crimes or work against interest of UK should be accountable no matter where they are. There’s nothing new in the Law for HK.
A: The law is clear. It outlines 4 categories of crime against national security. As long as a journalist abides by law, you have nothing to worry about. Also human rights are fully respected.
A: Huawei is a win-win example of China-UK collaboration. Having Huawei is in fundamental interest of UK. If UK chooses to pay a higher price for less qualified products, it’s up to you.
A: I have been Chinese Ambassador for 10+ years. I can totally reject any accusation of China interfering in UK’s internal affairs. If you have evidence,please show me.But do not make disinformation&false accusation against China.
A: Huawei has done its best to address security concern and tried to improve its technology. Intelligence agencies said risks are manageable and technology in general is safe. It’s up to the UK to make the final decision.
A:On BNO issue, we don’t think UK has honoured its commitment. This is an interference in China’s internal affairs & it’s a political manipulation. We will decide on counter measures in accordance with the actual actions by UK.
A: Once basic principles are violated, there will certainly be consequences for relationship. The mutual trust&confidence will be weakened. We hope UK will stand by the fundamental interests between China-UK.
A: I hope normal exchanges of students between China-UK will go forward. I have not seen any negative consequences on educational cooperation.
A: “Golden Era” was an idea proposed by UK side&endorsed by both sides. Whether it’s over or not is not up to Chinese side. I hope our relationship will develop further&enjoy steady growth in the best interests of both.
A:The election will be conducted in accordance with law. Nothing has changed as long as you do not violate National Security Law. HK’s social system, legislative system&legal system remain unchanged.
A:We hope UK will reconsider their position on BNO. With regard to what response China is going to make, we have to wait and see what will be the specific actions from the British side.
A: I think CGTN has already made a rebuttal. I think they have made their position very clear. The accusation against CGTN is totally not based on fact.
A: Not at all. Freedom of speech&the press in Hong Kong will be protected. As long as people abide by National Security Law, do not cross the line prohibited by the Law, they should be 100% free.
A: The Law has made it very clear that law enforcement people, including police, the people working in national security offices, have to abide by the law in China&the law in Hong Kong.
A: Some UK politicians still have very strong colonial mindset. They make irresponsible remarks, and try to interfere in HK affairs. They fail to realise that HK is now part of China.
A: It damages UK’s image as an open, business-friendly, free &transparent environment as it claims. It tarnishes its image as a country which follows independent policy. It means UK has succumbed to foreign pressure.
A:The Law can guarantee a sound business environment for HK. UK public&media should approach it from an objective,correct&accurate perspective. HK will become a safer, better&more prosperous place.