The first thing that you should know is that this book is not published by any actual academic publishers, e.g OUP, Routledge, Palgrave Macmillan, Brill, Sage etc...
But instead Dario decided to go with a organization on the same tier as Alex Jones' Infowars.
(Pearce, pg 33)
DFM likes to talk a lot about "primary sources"
Since he cannot read the primary sources, he cites secondary sources & translations.
Even going as far to ignore sources that disprove him, and then lie that he "provided his reader all the known evidence"
DFM does not understand what a "dhimmi" is in Islamic societies, or even Islam it self.
Under Sharia non-Muslims could live under their own laws, i.e Jews would rule themselves according to their Torah.
However DFM interpret this as proofs that they did not coexist in peace.
Nor does DFM understand the context of historical documents from the perspective of the author of in that specific period of history and the events around it.
Because this book is targeted towards right-wing conspiracy groups, they will be unable to realize he's lying to them.
This whole book is just about the usual InfoWars conspiracies about "Marxist liberal conspiracy in academia" and "Islamic Golden Age never happened cause it debunks my right-wing politics".
You can reference this thread whenever you see that book being cited.
</thread>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread debunking the feminist myth that what you wear doesn't matter, and clothing doesn't prevent sexual harassments. (Proven with scientific studies on the topic)
Short summary: Yes the hijab does prevent sexual harassments and attracts less male attention
Scientific studies have shown women are aware of the sexual signals their clothing sends:
1- Women who wore immodest clothing did so in order to flirt with strangers.
2- Women who wore sexual clothing did so in order to have sex with strangers.
More scientific studies confirm these findings, and have also shown women who wear immodest or sexual clothing self-objectify themselves, which cause anxiety, unhappiness, body-dissatisfaction, and body shame.
Why atheists have sex with dogs - (explained from the point of view of atheism as to accurately represent atheist voices)
A thread exposing atheism, & why normal people will never accept atheism (proven with scientific papers)
You might have seen this video of a PhD atheist philosopher promoting bestiality as a human right
It's not surprising, many sexual orientations were persecuted a decade ago, & this is the next new sexual orientation that secular atheism wants to liberate