Petition is listed before Justice Prathiba Singh. The matter was earlier heard by a Division Bench on the aspect of delay in conduction of examination.
Petitions are likely to be listed this Friday or Monday : Adv Apurva Kurup for UGC.
The petitions before the Supreme Court challenge UGC direction to colleges to mandatorily conduct final year exam.
Graduating people on the basis on past performance is not an option: UGC
Not an issue as long as sanctity of examination is maintained: UGC
Can you allow students to come to Delhi ? : Court
The guidelines are for pan India : UGC
It is not only offline examination: UGC
Traditional mode is very time taking. OBE is prima facie troublesome: Petitioner
MCQ can be done. It is allowed. Globally, several exams are MCQ based: UGC
There was a survey amongst the students. The sample size is 232 students : Intervenor
How are others doing it? There are more than 200 universities. They have all finished it: Court
4g is not required : Senior Adv Dutta
Your brochure says so : Court
Question paper will come to your inbox: Senior Adv Dutta
3g will be fine. As long as you can open your email: Senior Adv Dutta
There is no 3g is Kashmir. Assam has floods: Counsel for Petitioner
Give them two days to write the exam : Court
There was a meeting and there was only an advisory to postpone if they were not ready : Adv Sunieta Ojha
Bring the advisory on record : Court
There is no written advisory: Centre
Can presentation etc be online? : Court
That's not what we intended: UGC
It is a general statement: UGC
We will take instructions : UGC
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta joins the hearing.
UGC to clarify the import of the April guidelines on the July Guidelines for conduction of final year examination.
There is cynicism in the petitioners: Senior Adv Dutta
There is no divergence internally between MHRD and UGC : SG Mehta
barandbench.com/news/litigatio…