I will share you a thread, you will fall off laughing reading it. Before doing anything, read the last tweet to understand the context. Ok. To the topic. Indus-Brahmaputra suture is the border for yaks and donkeys, not humans.
Humans have aspiration and technology. For a change, you can read about Zhangzhung, the Three Princes of Tibet and the word Manasarovar - and how they are linked to India.
Now, the question is, what is India doing on the other side of Himalayas. Ever heard of a kingdom of Ladakh? Do you know how far their territories extended? Or, may be, who helped them when Tibetan armies put Bagso on siege? Or what's in the 1684 Treaty?
Now the main part. In a traditional map, East stays in right and North at top. Russia is in North of India, not East. So, when you talk about Russia-British fight, you need to look at Khotan, not Ladakh. By the way, Russians don't care about G219. They have a different road.
Now comes the hilarious part. For a change, you can look into this map. I guess you can demarcate the lines. Tibet, Dzungharia, Altishahr, Mongolia(Dzungharia is an extension of Mongolia), Manchuria, Korea, Vietnam - none of them are China.
Care to explain how Turkey encroaching into Syria a civilizational dishonour to China? By the way, Sino-Sikh War happened in 1842 and not 1834. Ladakh was annexed before Sino-Sikh War and not after.
Now, coming to Ladakh. If you have the knowledge, you will understand what this is. Anyways, I can't rely on your skills. Ngari is not even Tibet. Tibet starts at Maryum Pass. Ngari, Ladakh and Zanskar are sister kingdoms. They have a different culture.
Tibet annexed Ngari from Ladakh in 1684. And in 1684, Aurangzeb was ruling India, not British.
I am clueless again. When China built a road in India after invading and occupying Tibet, how does China have a right over Aksai Chin or Khotan or whatever?
I am clueless again. When China built a road in India after invading and occupying Tibet, how does China have a right over Aksai Chin or Khotan or whatever?
Now, explain me this. You first invade and occupy Tibet. Then, you say what lies on the other side of Tibet is also yours? How do you explain this? Now, India will say Ngari is Indian. Will that make the whole of China disputed territory?
It's time to look at the profile of the person. "British by Birth | Punjabi by Blood | American by Choice" This settles half the stuff. Pakistan violating the UN resolution by not vacating JK and then splits the province into two, it's no problem, eh?
And no. China is not offended because of this. Just because your masters from that joke of a country believe so, it's not the case. China is offended because of Operation Sunrise. I guess you wouldn't have heard about it as well?
Again the same tantrums. China is the territory shaded in red. How exactly did China and Ladakh share a border?
You need to remember two things
1. Tibet is not China.
2. Ladakh is not Tibet
You can ask any Tibetan over the both.
You need to remember two things
1. Tibet is not China.
2. Ladakh is not Tibet
You can ask any Tibetan over the both.
And when India and China don't share borders, how exactly will India invade China and annex territories from China? In fact, India extends till Maryum Pass. India reclaiming is called invading and China invading is called reclaiming?
Now coming to the last tweet. Verma is a Kayasth. So, why does a Kayasth use Brahmanwad? Only if he isn't a Kayasth. But, China's dealings with christians no evangelic will talk about even in dreams. So, who is this Pete Mian?
