People seem to be making a big deal out of some new papers, but frankly there's not a huge amount of new information here - quick run down
1/13
Lots of kids infected, including young children
2/13
cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…
Good break down here by @DiseaseEcology (although I disagree with the take on household transmission studies!)
3/13
Attack rate is pretty high though!
4/13
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We cannot tell direction of transmission, but to me this looks like too many cases too fast to all be spread between children; I imagine multiple sources of entry
Secondary schools do seem higher risk
5/13
eurosurveillance.org/content/10.280…
6/13
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26…
Here (Jones)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Here (Kawasuji)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Confused? Me too.
7/13
It's nice that they targeted ONLY symptomatic individuals, so at least we have a consistent denominator
Shame we still don't know how many children are asymptomatic...
8/13
Sadly it's impossible to tell from these studies the true effect as school closures are never adopted in isolation
Not sure it's helpful
9/13
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
Not sure we've gotten any further
10/13
ijidonline.com/article/S1201-…
The first by @mugecevik @mlipsitch and @EdwardGoldste16 (a veritable A team of #COVID19) on age and transmission
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
11/13
Includes interesting findings on duration of viral shedding according to age (although kids data poor, might explain apparent reduced infectivity of children despite similar VL?)
12/13
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Hoping to get the @DFTBubbles #COVID19 in children review up to date soon too!
dontforgetthebubbles.com/evidence-summa…
13/13