My Authors
Read all threads
As Oregon Gov. Kate Brown crafted a bill in 2018 to enact sweeping limits on greenhouse gas emissions, leaders at an obscure state agency worked behind the scenes to discredit research they feared would persuade her to target one of the state’s most powerful industries. (1/10)
The research calculated for the first time how much carbon was lost to the atmosphere as a result of cutting trees in Oregon. It concluded that logging, once thought to have no negative effect on global warming, was among the state’s biggest climate polluters. (2/10)
Researchers led by Oregon State University forest ecologist Beverly Law found that the state could dramatically shrink its carbon footprint if trees on private land were cut less frequently, a recommendation that pushed against the approach of Wall Street investment funds. (3/10)
The findings alarmed forest industry leaders in Oregon, who quickly assembled scientists and lobbyists to challenge the study and its authors. (4/10)
Among the groups leading the fight was the Oregon Forest Resources Institute, a quasi-governmental state agency funded with tax dollars that is, by law, restricted from influencing or attempting to influence policy. (5/10)
Leaders at the institute worked behind the scenes for months to persuade lawmakers and the dean of Oregon State’s College of Forestry that the research was flawed, informing timber lobbyists of their efforts along the way. (6/10)
The institute needs to “develop a swift, fairly immediate, response so that this study doesn’t drive all of the initial narrative,” Timm Locke, the agency’s forest products director at the time, wrote in a May 2018 email with the subject line “Bev Law carbon BS.” (7/10)
Then, Locke, a public employee, offered to help a timber lobbyist draft a counterargument “those of us in the industry can use.” (8/10)
The email is one obtained as part of an investigation by @ Oregonian, @OPB and @ProPublica, which found that the institute has acted as a public-relations agency and lobbying arm for the timber industry, skirting legal constraints that forbid it from doing so. (9/10)
Read the full story: trib.al/cpW0IrK (10/10)
📰 Our journalism is funded by subscribers. You may be asked to help support us in order to read this article. We appreciate you.
A digital subscription is just $10/month. It’s quick and easy to subscribe: oregonlive.com/digitalsubscri…
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with The Oregonian

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!