As well as activities like cognitive bias testing, we use choice (which one do you prefer?) & motivation (how much does this matter to you?) tests in #science to help learn what animals need / want to enjoy good #animalwelfare. Assessment uses behaviour & physiology 🖼@AllieBrosh
In my PhD I collected saliva from young Guide Dogs 🦮 to monitor stress using cortisol. This led to collaborating with @NDreschel@PENNSTATEU1 to do a meta-analysis of lots of studies who had tested salivary cortisol in dogs. Representing over 3L of dog spit 🐶💦 it was awesome!
We were able to identify significant factors that could impact cortisol results using the power of all the different studies. It was a helpful contribution for comparing studies & shaping future atudy design. Cortisol is widely used but still much to learn blogs.scientificamerican.com/dog-spies/what…
The actual paper is here if you’re really into dog spit 😆 sciencedirect.com/science/articl… (If you don’t have journal access, please know you can always email authors to request a PDF of their article - make our day!) #science
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Our findings suggest that student evaluations of teaching seem to measure *conformity with gendered expectations* rather than teaching quality
A cause for concern given the integration of SET data into performance profiles, and management and organisation of teaching practice
3/Before I go on, in terms of the necessarily binary reporting, it is very important to say here that we recognise the ‘pluralities inherent in gender(s)’ that complicate simple binary approaches to gender (Weerawardhana, 2018, p.189), and we do discuss this in the paper
On important background, in March 2020 the IOC recognised harassment and abuse as a current human rights challenge, and in particular recognised that LGBTQI+ athletes are at “particular risk of harm and structural discrimination”
3/n
The IOC now recognise female eligibility regulation *as an organisational violence issue* and as systemic discrimination
[I'll do another tweet thread on this later, drawing on my own research on this]
I want to address a narrative that we see around women’s sport and inclusion (particularly from those who seek to exclude trans women & women with sex variations from women’s sport), and how this narrative is part of a bigger pattern that functions to keep women small
2/n
I have been hearing more frequently the narrative that women's sport apparently exists as a 'protected category' so that women can win (because, on this account, without it no woman will ever win again)
3/n
This is:
a) *not* the reason why women's sport exists as a category,
and b) it is *not* true that no woman will ever win again.
This narrative is profoundly paternalistic and keeps women small.