The concept of Contempt of Court is nothing other than contempt of individual inalienable human rights. Those rights precede legal institutions, governments and religion.
If at all anyone needs to be held in contempt, it would be the Courts and the Court officers specifically.
If at all anyone needs to be held in contempt, it would be the Courts and the Court officers specifically.
My right to free speech was neither granted to me by the government or its arms nor can it be taken away by them. Unless citizens understand that basic principle, they will keep getting jerked around by distortions of fundamental principles by those who exist only to CONTROL you.
Free speech includes the right to offend, insult, deny, disengage. The only limitations to free speech are if it directly causes harm to another's life, property or liberty.
Anything beyond that is mere entitlement on part of the offended party to suppress free speech.
Anything beyond that is mere entitlement on part of the offended party to suppress free speech.
For example, if someone were to opine that Courts are a den of vipers with one eye on a sinecure and another on pleasing the king, it is well within the individual's right to free speech and should have no repercussions other than the Court saying, You Sir, speak the truth! 😂
The Court could also respond by saying, Fcuk you!!
Neither party should be offended by such an exchange as no one's life, liberty or property was harmed.
It is that simple.
One does not need 1000 page judgements with 999 pages of nonsense to arrive at such a simple conclusion.
Neither party should be offended by such an exchange as no one's life, liberty or property was harmed.
It is that simple.
One does not need 1000 page judgements with 999 pages of nonsense to arrive at such a simple conclusion.
These words will be true till the end of time. Or its next beginning. The Universe may Red Shift till infinity, then it may Blue Shift till it is a singularity, but these words will always be true. 
