Okay...this tweet has led to some interesting discussions about the teacher-student dynamic, unpaid labor, wingpeople, and the like...I guess I'll process out loud because I'm a glutton for punishment?
I was throwing spaghetti at the wall here at a way we could get students more engaged in sync online sessions AND help manage faculty overload. I'm always seeking those spaces of mutualism in our work.
What I'm talking about is stepping away from our role as the sole leader in the classroom and inviting students into leadership roles. Moving from a sage on the stage to a guide on the side in our Zoom classes.
What might that look like? I'm not sure. That's what I'm pondering. Could students take turns leading the chat space? Could students take turns leading breakout room discussions? Could students help keep time to stay on task?
A sub-topic has evolved, as they do, about paying tech assistants to support faculty. I think that's a fantastic idea too. That's not what I was thinking about, but I think it's a great idea.
But I notice a reaction to the idea that students should take on leadership roles in the classroom. That's what we want folks! That's active learning and agency. That's where the magic happens.
Is that unpaid labor?
I got back to this whole thing we talked about last week about the pushback against asynch online courses. The idea that students there have to "teach themselves." We get uncomfortable with the idea of self-directed learning.
We know lecture doesn't really work in most cases, but many of us want that sage on the stage.
Again, Rebecca Cox did a great job of exploring this in The College Fear Factor if you want a deep dive on this.
Where is the line b/t engaging students as teachers in the classroom and having them become unpaid teaching assistants? That's a great question for sure.
But I just think there's much more to this conversation than that. The idea of teacher-students and student-teachers freaks a lot of us out, myself included.
But I'm kind of excited to think that maybe remote/online teaching will help faculty to get students more involved as co-facilitators and bring that back into the physical classroom space.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TLDR: ADHD is a life-threatening condition. Systems, routines, and structures keep me alive. Ignorant critiques of these strategies are ableist. Let's do better. Happy Monday!
Faculty, staff, and students should not be left in the wind like this to wonder why this is happening. It’s infuriating tbh, and #HigherEd continues to be its own worst enemy.
We have to prioritize well-being and talk about trauma.
Okay here goes nothing. A new thread 🧵about #CourseHero.
My name's Karen, I've worked in #HigherEd for 20 years, and this is the absolute last thing I want to talk about today. But, I'm compelled in the face of what I see as immense harm being done to students.
I want to be as transparent as possible and encourage you to take nothing I say at face value. Don't trust me. Trust what you see.
To that end, here's how I've profited thus far from talking about Course Hero, for any who might wonder about my motivations. $1.19.
I don't disagree with anything in this piece. What I find really interesting is the assumption that those of us who are advocating for caring pedagogy, grounded in a balance b/t support and challenge, have at any point become less rigorous.
And that to me is the mark of #ToxicRigor. When someone points to flexibility, humanizing, and support and says, "You're dumbing things down" or "You've sacrificed rigor," there's just no evidence of that, so something else is up.