Stoney's tenure has been a roller coaster of ups and downs. Before #GeorgeFloyd, it seemed the failed #NavyHill development would be the albatross that possibly ended his career. But the #BLM protests have made his re-election prospects even trickier
2/
A lot of folks, largely conservatives and property owners, oppose protests by default. They don't understand them, & rely on media and authorities who continue to refer to "violence" and "looters" to de-legitimize any political claims that animate them
3/
These folks -- many in the surrounding counties, but not all -- blame Stoney for not "controlling the violence." He let the looters "destroy downtown" and "turn Richmond into Chicago or New York." (+ many, many other racist #DogWhistles that will make you lurv humanity) 4/
On the other hand, the city's growing YPPC (young progressive political class) feels like -- with just a wee bit of justification -- Stoney has either no will or ability to control a lawless police force that has continued to brutalize protesters
Even Stoney's bold action to remove monuments did more for his national than local profile; questions remain about who and how he paid for it, and his political opponents are taking advantage
Now Stoney still got a lot of the state's Democratic Party machinery behind him - Northam endorsed him, and old-school city Dems like Dolores McQuinn and JJ Minor have his back
7/
But Northam has his own similar dynamic! Conservatives hate him for destroying the economy because he dared to ask people not to die from COVID; progressives probably recalled how disqualifying his blackface scandal should have been while his state police beat and gassed them 8/
[Endorsements are less important for voters anyway, and more signals to donors and other officials that "this guy is still legit" - you want the $$ to keep flowing, and Stoney at least has that going for him
9/
McQuinn and Minor have seen their power ebb as YPPC take more control of Dem orgs. How many districts can the old school Dem machine deliver? For example, 8th is all about #RVACouncil Reva and state Sen #Jomo, who would prefer to eat Stoney's entrails than deliver him votes 10/
[A reminder that thanks to RVA's racist past, candidates must win majority of votes in 5 of city's 9 council districts to avoid a runoff for Mayor. It makes election predictions fun for the whole fam] 11/
My guess is that Stoney figures his best bet is incumbency + name recognition + state/natl Dem $$ + a few challengers, so lay low and try to split the difference (or play both sides against the middle or whatever). "I choose Richmond" instead of taking a side. On anything.
12/
It may work! We are entering an unprecedented election season, with a pandemic quarantine and the trauma of policing protests affecting outcomes in unpredictable ways. I can think of worse strategies than incumbency & $$.
13/
Can't end this thread without a reminder to vote, you big sillies! You can vote by mail if you have to, as I write in this week's @StyleWeekly .
14/End styleweekly.com/richmond/opini…
As I prep my political theory class for this fall, I'm struck that one thing the TX abortion law should hammer home, and that some of us sometimes forget: conservatism is openly hostile towards individual freedom #Thread
1/
As ideology, conservatism embraces ancient ideas of difference. Plato's Republic imagines world where people are sorted according to innate characteristics; Aristotle thought democracy was worst form of government. To Greeks, some people just better suited to rule than others
2/
In 1790, Brit Edmund Burke essentially launched conservatism by criticizing the French revolution. Liberty is fine, Burke argued, but what if it's the liberty of a "madman" or "murderer"? Freedom needs constraints, and isn't for everyone
3/
As #VAGOP convention approaches, candidates talking about banning "critical race theory" from our schools. We know that racist appeals work on many white voters (hi Donald!) but this one is especially insidious. Here's why #Thread
1/
First, #CriticalRaceTheory is term for some pretty high-level scholarship and theoretical work, like real pomo philosophy shit. Crenshaw, Delgado, Bell. Mostly influential in legal theory. Time mag explainer (h/t to @bluevirginia) is just fine: 2/ time.com/5891138/critic…
Key here: CRT is WAY less influential than critics claim, even in theory circles. Often mocked by traditional establishment voices. Just check this '98 Cornell law review article that claims to take CRT seriously, but actually drips w mockery/disdain 3/ scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewconten…
Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…