"Whether housemates or friends sharing a Discord group, squads allow social currency and financial capital to inter-convert, creating opportunities and group resiliency that would have been impossible to achieve alone."
"With new plug-and-play financial tools, squads are becoming more economically and socially resilient.
Individuals may have limited access to compounding returns, but groups have greater flexibility to move along the risk-reward curve."
"Recent events have completely exposed the limits of individual agency, creating a powerful demand for squad-based forms of resiliency...today's emerging culture of group cohesion is driven equally by the social and financial precarity of urban life."
"Squads are woke to the empty neoliberal promises of gig-economy 'employment' and para-social personal brands.
Squads value self-determination, not through individualism, but through collective maintenance and care for one another."
"Squads have little use for internal financial incentives.
Instead, playful exchanges produce trust, reciprocity, and VIBES—the ineffable group energy that squads value most.
Accordingly, the core of squad production is the continuous production of the squad itself."
"Though dollars keep squads afloat, dialing up the financial infrastructure too soon can kill the vibe. The squad economy primarily yields non-monetary forms of value."
"Contributions to the squad are positive-sum. And in return for their contribution, members have access to an expanded set of opportunities, claims on future economic flows and guarantees backed by the group."
"The point is clear: access to finance and the creation of capital assets is crucial. What squads need now is the technical infrastructure to capture and compound jointly produced value." --> this is where #DAOs are going to 🚀
One of our great challenges in crypto is balancing financial incentives for global sustenance, with non-financial incentives to maximize the VIBES of local coordination.
Everyone designing crypto-systems needs to deeply consider the balance between extrinsic and intrinsic incentives.
We all need enough extrinsic incentives (mainly, $$$) to survive, and those extrinsic incentives need to be fairly accessible, which #crypto is doing a decent job of enabling.
But once the extrinsic is secured humans tend to go intrinsic, searching for where the VIBES are. The VIBES have the meaning we all seek.
In the last bear, one of the reasons @placeholdervc focused on @solana was a belief that it would be the normie-chain w/ its speed, low fees & smooth UX. That's playing out with memecoins & more.
But we've been @ethereum supporters since inception, and that hasn't changed... 🧵
This cycle, though @ethereum may lose "normie-share" to @solana (already is), the community should continue leaning into cementing the network @ the center of the Internet Financial System (IFS). The IFS will grow in relevance into the back half of this decade, onboarding even more normies than we currently see.
.@solana & others will come for the IFS too (already are), but @ethereum has a solid foundation as it's over a decade old, with brand awareness 2nd only to #Bitcoin, deep liquidity, and implementations like @base drawing corporate eyes.
People on CT showcase far too "mutually exclusive" an attitude when they approach investing -- perhaps it's a product of how social media rewards sensationalism. First it was either $BTC or $ETH. Now it's either $ETH or $SOL. Next year it will be something different 🧵
Much better imo to build a balanced portfolio where you cut losers when you realize they're losers, but then firmly hold winners and let them compound. Big winners are relatively easy to spot, and best to buy in a bear. Hence why I tell newcomers to start w/ $BTC $ETH & $SOL, and go from there.
Sure, sell some at tops to give yourself cash for bottom-feeding, but don't obsess with perfection, and instead stay generally long the big ecosystems that will keep winning. Ignore short term noise, for which X is notorious -- every ecosystem hits hiccups.
If you've been paying attention, as I know @ZoomerOracle has, you'll notice "shiny new coins" have been shining once again.
Market participants learn a lesson in one market environment, and then try to apply it to all market environments, instead of thinking critically about what works in a bull, versus what works in a bear.
The tragedy in this "momentum learning" is that we go from "bull to bear to bull to bear," and so the lessons of a bull get you rekt in a bear, while the lessons of a bear get you rekt in a bull.
One needs to layer the lessons and think critically.
1/ Still longing $TIA while haters spinelessly pile onto the downside momentum. When @CelestiaOrg recovers, it's not me that will be haunted by the thought, "Instead of jeering, I could have been buying $TIA < $5."
2/ $TIA shorts paying up to 380% annualized to be short after an 80%+ drawdown - you can't make this stuff up 😂 coinglass.com/currencies/TIA
3/ Everyone and their mother is fixated on the "big $TIA unlock" in October. Paid groups and momentum bottom trolls are drooling with delight, claiming $TIA will get crushed when the "evil VCs" are given liquidity, hence piling onto these expensive shorts token.unlocks.app/celestia