It pains me that “wildfire” is now used as a political excuse to block bills allowing more infill housing in the urban core away from the wildland-urban interface. (I’m looking at you @HenrySternCA for your bullshit ass vote against #sb50 last spring.)
It pains me that @GavinNewsom at least as of last year wasn’t able to take more of a harder line against more development in the WUI. abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS… see
It pains me that we don’t allocate sufficient budget to preventative burns and vegetation management. Or respect thousands of years of indigenous knowledge of “good fires.” propublica.org/article/they-k…
At the same time, Californian voters don’t understand how (at least initially) expensive prevention can be. Think $10K a stump to remove a mature euc (or like $1M to clear a few blocks w a grove) or $3-4M to underground 1 mi of wire in the Bay Area.
Then again, 100 houses in the Bay Area is like $100-200M of real estate so putting a few million down to protect it shouldn’t be that insane. But lots of homeowners (especially older ones) don’t have the cashflow to support it.
Not trolly. Could envision a California of mid rise density surrounded by vineyards as the WUI (they served as unintentional firebreaks in Wine Country) but we couldn’t even get duplexes done this year.
Yes, in certain jurisdictions in Oregon, having out-of-control vegetation on your own property is a public nuisance and can come with abatements or penalties.
I mean, look at this dry, hot wind basically over the entire state of Oregon later tonight.
I should add, unlike @HenrySternCA who says nice things about housing & wildfire but votes the opposite way, there *are* good legislators who balance both concerns like @ilike_mike, representing much of Northern California from Marin to the Oregon border.
Also, remember the 147 million trees that died over the last several years? That’s why there’s so much fuel load in the Sierras with relatively minimal wind (until tonight’s offshore winds event). sfchronicle.com/outdoors/stien…
"A lot of you people are going to be alive. And you’re going to be alive in a horrible situation. You’re going to see mass migrations, vector disease and forest fires."
😭 This is much harder than telling people to wear a mask or not. This is about where people should or shouldn't live, and what public resources can be expended to support living in more firesafe areas.
On the positive side, doesn't look like there will be another offshore winds event for at least 2 weeks or so. So just got to ride out these particular fires and this particular smoke.
On the negative side, we have more than two months left to go in the total season, assuming rains come around Thanksgiving. (Rains used to come around Halloween growing up).
Per @judegomila's original question, we could do a Green New Deal supporting enormous #s of new jobs for mass tree thinning & vegetation management across the West + tech for aerial mapping & labeling of fuel loads.
Also, here's a Fire Season Twitter list I curated if you're interested in subscribing to meteorologists, government agencies, fire scanner watchers, etc.: twitter.com/i/lists/129776…
“Ken Kirkland at the Woolly Egg Ranch family farm said his 500 chickens have been silent all morning. When he went out to check on them around 10:30 a.m., they just were standing around staring, confused and not eating.
CA legislature couldn't even get duplexes done, but long-term maybe the Overton window should open for a discussion about an air rights trading system that could financially incentivize infill in defensible areas and conversion of non-defensible WUI back to nature/firebreaks.
Also worth re-upping this animated GIF from @LeroyWesterling's research.
WE ARE ON THE RCP 8.5 PATH! If you don't know what that means, you should educate yourself:
Pretty incredible contrast in fire outcomes between indigenous and Western-managed land in this thread here. A canopy fire that drops into an underburn (rather than the reverse with a crowning fire)!
If the Supreme Court rules on this, well, all I can say is it will be a really bad ruling that emboldens criminalization of the poor all across the US. (And it won’t be particularly effective.)
We tried this approach in San Francisco in the early 1990s under former mayor Frank Jordan, who was previously a police chief. He argued people should be sent to jail if they slept in the streets.
SF voters even passed a measure making panhandling illegal, with penalties of jail sentences or stiff fines.
SF added so many taxes and fees to construction of new housing (largely in 2016) that developers just went to Oakland instead. sfchronicle.com/bayarea/articl…
Oh, a fee study from @TernerHousing out today. CA undertaxes existing housing and over time property taxes don’t keep up with the cost of operating public systems, so instead we just tax the very small amount of new housing we build to compensate for that.
The #1 cause of homelessness in SF, according to interviews of people without housing and the comprehensive point-in-time count out today, is job loss. It's bad the count went up during a boom, but don't fool yourselves into believing that it wouldn't get worse in a downturn.
.@BettyYeeforCA, the state controller, warned last month that in a recession, housing costs may continue to rise even with layoffs. At the same time, both state & local govts would have to make hard choices on cutting housing assistance vs. other programs. sco.ca.gov/2019_06summary…
"If your face appears in the background of another person’s TikTok video shot in Berlin, will it be logged using facial recognition software running in Shanghai?"
.@oliviasolon & @cfarivar wrote this yesterday about a friendly-seeming app actually using consumer data to train facial recognition systems. Remember in the US, there is at least an adversarial, free press & separation between state and corporate entities
One reason that Bay Area cities resort to approving large amounts of [tech] office space is in part because single-family homeowners do not pay property tax levels that keep pace with the cost of providing services. So local govts have to look toward alternate strategies.
Why did they do this? Well, actually, San Jose has a housing surplus (!) compared to neighboring Santa Clara County cities. Shouldn't that be exciting? sanjose.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&…
In Japan, train companies can earn revenue from rents in surrounding station areas on top of fares. In CA, we can invest billions in infrastructure and subsequent spikes in nearby land/property values are captured almost wholly by the people who happen to own nearby property.
.@SFBART and @Caltrain have some of the best farebox recovery ratios in North America but you really need the land rent/land value capture + density to make the #s and system work well. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farebox_r…